Habituated visual neurons in locusts remain sensitive to novel looming objects

SUMMARY Many animals must contend with visual cues that provide information about the spatiotemporal dynamics of multiple objects in their environment. Much research has been devoted to understanding how an identified pair of interneurons in the locust, the Descending Contralateral Movement Detectors (DCMDs), respond to objects on an impending collision course. However, little is known about how these neurons respond when challenged with multiple, looming objects of different complex shapes. I presented locusts with objects resembling either another locust or a bird approaching on a direct collision course at 3 m s-1 while recording from the DCMD axon within the mesothoracic ganglion. Stimulus presentations were designed to test: (i) whether DCMD habituation was related to the frequency of approach, (ii) if habituated DCMDs were able to respond to a novel stimulus and (iii) if non-looming motion within complex objects (internal object motion) during approach affects habituation. DCMD responses to simulated locusts or birds habituated more when the time interval between consecutive approaches within similar sequences decreased from 34 s to 4 s. Strongly habituated DCMDs were, however, able to respond to the same object approaching along a new trajectory or to a larger object approaching along the same trajectory. Habituation was not affected by internal object motion. These data are consistent with earlier findings that DCMD habituation occurs at localized synapses, which permits maintained sensitivity to multiple objects in the animal's environment.

[1]  Robert C. Eaton,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Startle Behavior , 1984 .

[2]  Keir G. Pearson,et al.  Escape Behavior of the Locust , 1984 .

[3]  M O'shea,et al.  The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. II. response decrement, convergence, and the nature of the excitatory afferents to the fan-like dendrites of the LGMD. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  G. Laurent,et al.  Invariance of Angular Threshold Computation in a Wide-Field Looming-Sensitive Neuron , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Thomas Matheson,et al.  Plasticity in the visual system is correlated with a change in lifestyle of solitarious and gregarious locusts. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  C. Koch,et al.  Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming , 2002, Nature.

[7]  C. H. Fraser Rowell,et al.  The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. IV. The preference for small field stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  F C Rind,et al.  Intracellular characterization of neurons in the locust brain signaling impending collision. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  G. Laurent,et al.  Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field, Motion-Sensitive Neuron , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  P. Simmons,et al.  Seeing what is coming: building collision-sensitive neurones , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  M. Burrows,et al.  Connections between descending visual interneurons and metathoracic motoneurons in the locust , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[12]  J. Bacon,et al.  Identified octopaminergic neurons provide an arousal mechanism in the locust brain. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Schlotterer Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli , 1977 .

[14]  John R. Gray,et al.  Activity of descending contralateral movement detector neurons and collision avoidance behaviour in response to head-on visual stimuli in locusts , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  G A Horridge,et al.  The separation of visual axes in apposition compound eyes. , 1978, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  R. C. Miall,et al.  The flicker fusion frequencies of six laboratory insects, and the response of the compound eye to mains fluorescent ‘ripple’ , 1978 .

[17]  P. Simmons,et al.  Gliding behaviour elicited by lateral looming stimuli in flying locusts , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[18]  Gabriel Horn,et al.  Medium and Long-term Changes in the Behaviour of Visual Neurones in the Tritocerebrum of Locusts , 1968 .

[19]  M. Burrows The Neurobiology of an Insect Brain , 1996 .

[20]  G. Laurent,et al.  Elementary Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field Visual Neuron , 1995, Science.

[21]  Rind,et al.  The locust DCMD, a movement-detecting neurone tightly tuned to collision trajectories , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  H. Krapp,et al.  Spatial distribution of inputs and local receptive field properties of a wide-field, looming sensitive neuron. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  F Claire Rind,et al.  Motion detectors in the locust visual system: From biology to robot sensors , 2002, Microscopy research and technique.

[24]  Peter J. Simmons,et al.  Connexions between a movement-detecting visual interneurone and flight motoneurones of a locust. , 1980 .

[25]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[26]  F C Rind,et al.  Signaling of object approach by the DCMD neuron of the locust. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  C. Rowell,et al.  Variable Responsiveness of a Visual Interneurone in the Free-Moving Locust, and its Relation to Behaviour and Arousal , 1971 .

[28]  F C Rind,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. II. Critical cues for detecting approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate primary visual cortex. I. Stimulus-response relations. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Michael O'Shea,et al.  The anatomy and output connection of a locust visual interneurone; the lobular giant movement detector (LGMD) neurone , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[31]  J. Penhallurick KINGFISHERS, BEE-EATERS, AND ROLLERS , 2001 .

[32]  Z. Waloff Orientation of flying locusts, Schistocerca gregaria (Forsk.), in migrating swarms , 1972 .

[33]  Michael L. Anstey,et al.  Heat stress-mediated plasticity in a locust looming-sensitive visual interneuron. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Mark A Willis,et al.  A method for recording behavior and multineuronal CNS activity from tethered insects flying in virtual space , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  F C Rind,et al.  A chemical synapse between two motion detecting neurones in the locust brain. , 1984, The Journal of experimental biology.

[36]  P. Simmons,et al.  Local circuit for the computation of object approach by an identified visual neuron in the locust , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  Roger D Santer,et al.  Collision avoidance and a looming sensitive neuron: size matters but biggest is not necessarily best , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  K. Pearson,et al.  Interneurons in the flight system of the locust: Distribution, connections, and resetting properties , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.