Prediction of functionally important residues in globular proteins from unusual central distances of amino acids
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Vriend,et al. Prediction of protein residue contacts with a PDB-derived likelihood matrix. , 2002, Protein engineering.
[2] S. Rackovsky,et al. Hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and the radial and orientational distributions of residues in native proteins. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[3] R. Laskowski. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular graphics.
[4] Z. Weng,et al. Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0 , 2008, Proteins.
[5] J. Skolnick,et al. A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[6] Ryan G. Coleman,et al. Protein Pockets: Inventory, Shape, and Comparison , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[7] A. Schmidt,et al. Internal motion in protein crystal structures , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[8] Janet M. Thornton,et al. ProFunc: a server for predicting protein function from 3D structure , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[9] V. Gladyshev,et al. Cysteine function governs its conservation and degeneration and restricts its utilization on protein surfaces. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.
[10] M. Schroeder,et al. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation , 2006, BMC Structural Biology.
[11] Vincent Le Guilloux,et al. Fpocket: An open source platform for ligand pocket detection , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.
[12] M. Ondrechen,et al. THEMATICS: A simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[13] H. Guy. Amino acid side-chain partition energies and distribution of residues in soluble proteins. , 1985, Biophysical journal.
[14] J. Warwicker,et al. Enzyme/non-enzyme discrimination and prediction of enzyme active site location using charge-based methods. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[15] K. Dill. Dominant forces in protein folding. , 1990, Biochemistry.
[16] H. Edelsbrunner,et al. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: Measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[17] F M Richards,et al. An analysis of packing in the protein folding problem , 1993, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.
[18] Irena Roterman-Konieczna,et al. Prediction of Functional Sites Based on the Fuzzy Oil Drop Model , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[19] Alexandre G de Brevern,et al. Fast and automated functional classification with MED‐SuMo: An application on purine‐binding proteins , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[20] G. Schneider,et al. PocketPicker: analysis of ligand binding-sites with shape descriptors , 2007, Chemistry Central Journal.
[21] W. Kauzmann. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. , 1959, Advances in protein chemistry.
[22] Shuichi Hirono,et al. Evaluation of the searching abilities of HBOP and HBSITE for binding pocket detection , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[23] Bingding Huang,et al. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction. , 2009, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.
[24] Laurence Lins,et al. Analysis of accessible surface of residues in proteins , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[25] Artur Baumgärtner,et al. Shapes of flexible vesicles at constant volume , 1993 .
[26] S. Rackovsky,et al. Empirical Studies of Hydrophobicity. 1. Effect of Protein Size on the Hydrophobic Behavior of Amino Acids , 1980 .
[27] Ying Wei,et al. Partial Order Optimum Likelihood (POOL): Maximum Likelihood Prediction of Protein Active Site Residues Using 3D Structure and Sequence Properties , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[28] Pieter F. W. Stouten,et al. Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[29] José N Onuchic,et al. A sequence-compatible amount of native burial information is sufficient for determining the structure of small globular proteins , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] Paul Labute,et al. Pocket Similarity: Are α Carbons Enough? , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[31] Description of atomic burials in compact globular proteins by Fermi‐Dirac probability distributions , 2006, Proteins.
[32] Arteca. Scaling behavior of some molecular shape descriptors of polymer chains and protein backbones. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.
[33] C. DeLisi,et al. Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.
[34] Y-h. Taguchi,et al. Application of amino acid occurrence for discriminating different folding types of globular proteins , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.
[35] Tal Pupko,et al. Structural Genomics , 2005 .
[36] Lawrence P. Wackett,et al. Melamine Deaminase and Atrazine Chlorohydrolase: 98 Percent Identical but Functionally Different , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.
[37] Bin-Guang Ma,et al. What determines protein folding type? An investigation of intrinsic structural properties and its implications for understanding folding mechanisms. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.
[38] Z. Weng,et al. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction , 2007, Proteins.
[39] T. Lane,et al. Exploiting Amino Acid Composition for Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions , 2009, PloS one.
[40] Adam Godzik,et al. Clustering of highly homologous sequences to reduce the size of large protein databases , 2001, Bioinform..
[41] Vladimir A. Ivanisenko,et al. PDBSiteScan: a program for searching for active, binding and posttranslational modification sites in the 3D structures of proteins , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[42] Mona Singh,et al. Predicting Protein Ligand Binding Sites by Combining Evolutionary Sequence Conservation and 3D Structure , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[43] S. Rackovsky,et al. Information‐theoretic analysis of the reference state in contact potentials used for protein structure prediction , 2010, Proteins.
[44] Martin Zacharias,et al. Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein–protein docking with ATTRACT , 2010, Proteins.
[45] M. Jambon,et al. A new bioinformatic approach to detect common 3D sites in protein structures , 2003, Proteins.
[46] Oxana V. Galzitskaya,et al. Compactness Determines protein Folding Type , 2008, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..
[47] Salim Bougouffa,et al. SitesIdentify: a protein functional site prediction tool , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.
[48] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[49] Richard M. Jackson,et al. Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces , 2006, Bioinform..
[50] D. Levitt,et al. POCKET: a computer graphics method for identifying and displaying protein cavities and their surrounding amino acids. , 1992, Journal of molecular graphics.
[51] U. Bastolla,et al. Principal eigenvector of contact matrices and hydrophobicity profiles in proteins , 2004, Proteins.
[52] Lingle Wang,et al. Ligand binding to protein-binding pockets with wet and dry regions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[53] Andrea Passerini,et al. Automatic prediction of catalytic residues by modeling residue structural neighborhood , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[54] Irena Roterman-Konieczna,et al. Sequence-Structure-Function Relation Characterized in silico , 2006, Silico Biol..
[55] M Hendlich,et al. LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. , 1997, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[56] S. Jones,et al. Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[57] M. Sanner,et al. Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. , 1996, Biopolymers.
[58] Janet M. Thornton,et al. The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[59] Irena Roterman-Konieczna,et al. Gauss-Function-Based Model of Hydrophobicity Density in Proteins , 2006, Silico Biol..
[60] Philip E. Bourne,et al. A robust and efficient algorithm for the shape description of protein structures and its application in predicting ligand binding sites , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.
[61] A. Elcock. Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computed energetics of protein structure. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[62] Andrew J. Bordner,et al. Predicting small ligand binding sites in proteins using backbone structure , 2008, Bioinform..
[63] Ozlem Keskin,et al. Identification of computational hot spots in protein interfaces: combining solvent accessibility and inter-residue potentials improves the accuracy , 2009, Bioinform..
[64] J. Gibrat,et al. Secondary structure prediction: combination of three different methods. , 1988, Protein engineering.
[65] Oliviero Carugo,et al. Atom depth in protein structure and function. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[66] M. Sternberg,et al. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[67] Milton T. W. Hearn,et al. Physicochemical Basis of Amino Acid Hydrophobicity Scales: Evaluation of Four New Scales of Amino Acid Hydrophobicity Coefficients Derived from RP-HPLC of Peptides , 1995 .
[68] Richard M. Jackson,et al. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites , 2005, Bioinform..
[69] B. Berne,et al. Competition of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between small hydrophobes and model enclosures. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[70] Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al. Knowledge-based annotation of small molecule binding sites in proteins , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[71] K Nishikawa,et al. Correlation of the amino acid composition of a protein to its structural and biological characters. , 1982, Journal of biochemistry.
[72] Zhiping Weng,et al. Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0 , 2010, Proteins.
[73] Zheng Yuan,et al. Flexibility analysis of enzyme active sites by crystallographic temperature factors. , 2003, Protein engineering.
[74] A Godzik,et al. Conservation of residue interactions in a family of Ca-binding proteins. , 1989, Protein engineering.
[75] H Naderi-Manesh,et al. Prediction of protein surface accessibility with information theory. , 2000, Proteins.
[76] Sarah A. Teichmann,et al. Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.
[77] M. Eisenstein,et al. Looking at enzymes from the inside out: the proximity of catalytic residues to the molecular centroid can be used for detection of active sites and enzyme-ligand interfaces. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[78] Irena Roterman,et al. Localization of ligand binding site in proteins identified in silico , 2007, Journal of molecular modeling.
[79] A G Murzin,et al. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[80] Tianyun Liu,et al. Identification of recurring protein structure microenvironments and discovery of novel functional sites around CYS residues , 2010, BMC Structural Biology.
[81] David C. Jones,et al. CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. , 1997, Structure.
[82] D. Eisenberg,et al. The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[83] Saraswathi Vishveshwara,et al. Amino acid interaction preferences in proteins , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[84] S. J. Campbell,et al. Ligand binding: functional site location, similarity and docking. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.
[85] X. Daura,et al. Assessing the structural conservation of protein pockets to study functional and allosteric sites: implications for drug discovery , 2010, BMC Structural Biology.
[86] Zhiping Weng,et al. ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function , 2007, Proteins.
[87] G. Rose,et al. Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. , 1985, Science.
[88] R. Altman,et al. Characterizing the microenvironment surrounding protein sites , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[89] W. Goddard,et al. Computational modeling of structure-function of g protein-coupled receptors with applications for drug design. , 2010, Current medicinal chemistry.
[90] I M Klotz,et al. Comparison of molecular structures of proteins: helix content; distribution of apolar residues. , 1970, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.
[91] Lin Li,et al. ASPDock: protein-protein docking algorithm using atomic solvation parameters model , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[92] S Rackovsky,et al. Global characteristics of protein sequences and their implications , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[93] S. Jones,et al. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.