Feasibility of opto-electronic surgical instrument identification

One essential precondition of workflow analysis in minimally invasive surgery is a continuous data inflow in real time, in particular on the instruments in use. However, reliable identification systems are missing to date. We developed an automatic identification system which detects and registers the individual instrument during insertion into the trocar. The system is based on an opto-electronic object detection system using barcode 2/5 interleaved (printed out vs. lasered) which is detected by a micro endoscopic camera and light device. Evaluation was performed in vitro (laparoscopic training simulator) and in vivo (animal experiment) on 5 mm and 10 mm instruments with different insertion velocities into the trocar (20/10/1 cm/sec.). Furthermore, registration accuracy with a 1 - 5 sec. barcode retention period was evaluated. The best results were achieved with a 5 sec. static retention period of the barcode in the camera focus with a printed barcode. Retention periods of less than 5 sec. and dynamic insertions led to a significant decline of the detection rate. Opto-electronic barcode registration could be a promising technology for an automatic instrument registration. Although not yet mature for clinical application, the introduced system showed reliable results under static conditions.

[1]  Yves Delignon,et al.  One-dimensional barcode reading: an information theoretic approach. , 2008, Applied optics.

[2]  Jonathan P. Shepherd,et al.  A Technique for the Computerized Identification of Orthodontic Instruments , 1995, British journal of orthodontics.

[3]  E. Hanly,et al.  Twenty-first century surgery using twenty-first century technology: surgical robotics. , 2004, Current surgery.

[4]  A. Park,et al.  Advanced Devices for the Operating Room of the Future , 2003, Seminars in laparoscopic surgery.

[5]  M R Brickley,et al.  Automatic identification of surgical and orthodontic instruments. , 1994, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[6]  M. Gagner,et al.  The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  Alan D. Smith,et al.  Information management of automatic data capture: an overview of technical developments , 2002, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[8]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Bar-coding Surgical Sponges To Improve Safety: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[9]  M Gagner,et al.  The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century. A discussion of critical design elements. , 2001, Surgical endoscopy.

[10]  T. Wobbes [The operating room of the future]. , 2000, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[11]  Alex Macario,et al.  Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology. , 2006, Archives of surgery.

[12]  H. Feußner The Operating Room of the Future: A View from Europe , 2003, Seminars in laparoscopic surgery.

[13]  Michael R. Cohen,et al.  Practical guide to bar coding for patient medication safety. , 2003, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[14]  Deo Kumar Srivastava,et al.  Computer-assisted bar-coding system significantly reduces clinical laboratory specimen identification errors in a pediatric oncology hospital. , 2008, The Journal of pediatrics.