The Impact of Type A Behavior Pattern on Role Overload-induced Stress and Performance Attributions

A controlled laboratory experiment investigated the effects of Type A behavior pattern on role overload-induced stress and performance attributions. Although previous correlation studies have concluded that Type A individuals are more likely to feel stressed than Type B individuals, the present study did notfind this. The current study reports the alternative hypothesis that differences in reported stress between Type A and Type B individuals may occur because the Type A seeks out situations that are objectively more stressful. In contrast to the stress findings, performance attributions varied between Type A and Type B individuals. Results are discussed in terms of their theoretical and practical implications.

[1]  D. C. Glass,et al.  Behavior Patterns, Stress, and Coronary Disease , 1977 .

[2]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[3]  F. Rhodewalt,et al.  Reactance and the coronary-prone behavior pattern: the role of self-attribution in responses to reduced behavioral freedom. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Stress and Distress in Response to Psychosocial Stimuli , 1973 .

[5]  B. Weiner,et al.  Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure , 1989 .

[6]  R. Caplan,et al.  Effects of work load, role ambiguity, and type A personality on anxiety, depression, and heart rate. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  R. Burke,et al.  Preferred organizational climates of Type A individuals , 1982 .

[8]  Daniel Stokols,et al.  Physiological, motivational, and cognitive effects of aircraft noise on children: Moving from the laboratory to the field. , 1980 .

[9]  B. Houston,et al.  The type a behavior pattern, sex differences, and cardiovascular response to and recovery from stress , 1981 .

[10]  S. M. Sales,et al.  Some effects of role overload and role underload , 1970 .

[11]  J. Marshall,et al.  Occupational sources of stress ; a review of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental ill health , 1976 .

[12]  The type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and reactions to uncontrollable stress: an analysis of performance strategies, affect, and attributions during failure. , 1981, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Cognitive correlates of the Type A Coronary-Prone Behavior Pattern , 1981 .

[14]  J. Ivancevich,et al.  Occupational stress, Type A behavior, and physical well being. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[15]  J. Ivancevich,et al.  A Type A-B Person-Work Environment Interaction Model for Examining Occupational Stress and Consequences , 1984 .

[16]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Current concerns in occupational stress , 1982 .

[17]  C. Orpen.  Type A personality as a moderator of the effects of role conflict, role ambiguity and role overload on individual strain. , 1982, Journal of human stress.

[18]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Definition and conceptualization of stress in organizations , 1980 .

[20]  Stephen M. Sales.  Organizational Role as a Risk Factor in Coronary Disease , 1973, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[21]  K. E. Friend.  Stress and Performance: Effects of Subjective Work Load and Time Urgency. , 1982 .