Inhibition of EGFR, HER2, and HER3 signalling in patients with colorectal cancer wild-type for BRAF , PIK3CA , KRAS , and NRAS (FOCUS4-D): a phase 2–3 randomised trial

Background A substantial change in trial methodology for solid tumours has taken place, in response to increased understanding of cancer biology. FOCUS4 is a phase 2–3 trial programme testing targeted agents in patients with advanced colorectal cancer in molecularly stratified cohorts. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that combined inhibition of EGFR, HER2, and HER3 signalling with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor AZD8931 will control growth of all wild-type tumours. Methods In FOCUS4-D, we included patients from 18 hospitals in the UK with newly diagnosed advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer whose tumour was wild-type for BRAF , PIK3CA , KRAS , and NRAS . After 16 weeks of first-line therapy, patients with stable or responding tumours were randomised to oral AZD8931 (40 mg twice a day) or placebo. Randomisation was done by minimisation with a random element of 20%, minimisation by hospital site, site of primary tumour, WHO performance status, 16-week CT scan result, number of metastatic sites, and first-line chemotherapy regimen. The primary outcome was progression-free-survival. CT scans were assessed by local radiologists according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. Preplanned interim analyses were assessed per protocol and were agreed using multiarm multistage (MAMS) trial design methodology triggered by occurrence of progression-free survival events in the placebo group. The final analysis was assessed by intention to treat. This trial is registered at controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN 90061546. Findings Between July 7, 2014, and March 7, 2016, 32 patients were randomised to study treatment, 16 to AZD8931 and 16 to placebo. At the first preplanned interim analysis (March, 2016), the independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) recommended closure of FOCUS4-D because of a lack of activity. At the final analysis (Aug 1, 2016), 31 patients had had a progression-free survival event (15 with AZD8931 and 16 with placebo). Median progression-free survival was 3·48 months (95% CI 1·51–5·09) in the placebo group and 2·96 months (1·94–5·62) in the AZD8931 group. No progression-free survival benefit of AZD8931 compared with placebo was noted (hazard ratio [HR] 1·10, 95% CI 0·47–3·57; p=0·95). The most common grade 3 adverse event in the AZD8931 group was skin rash (three [20%] of 15 patients with available data vs none of 16 patients in the placebo group), and in the placebo group it was diarrhoea (one [7%] vs one [6%]). No grade 4 adverse events were recorded and no treatment-related deaths were reported. The MAMS trial design for FOCUS4 has shown efficiency and effectiveness in trial outcome delivery, informing the decision to proceed or stop clinical evaluation of a targeted treatment within a molecularly defined cohort of patients. The overarching FOCUS4 trial is now aiming to open a replacement arm in the cohort with all wild-type tumours. a of trastuzumab a cohort of metastatic colorectal to inhibit EGFR, HER2, and HER3 signalling. In two previous trials of AZD8931 as part of a combination strategy for breast cancer, no efficacy was

[1]  P. Quirke,et al.  Investigating the poor outcomes of BRAF-mutant advanced colorectal cancer: analysis from 2530 patients in randomised clinical trials , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  M. Cristofanilli,et al.  Inhibition of EGFR, HER2, and HER3 signaling with AZD8931 in combination with anastrozole as an anticancer approach: Phase II randomized study in women with endocrine-therapy-naïve advanced breast cancer , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  Peter C. Austin,et al.  Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  J. Barrett,et al.  HER2 overexpression and amplification as a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer: analysis of 3256 patients enrolled in the QUASAR, FOCUS and PICCOLO colorectal cancer trials , 2016, The Journal of pathology.

[5]  A. Hinke,et al.  Maintenance strategies after first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (AIO 0207): a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  M. D. James,et al.  Pre-trial inter-laboratory analytical validation of the FOCUS4 personalised therapy trial , 2015, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[7]  J. Barrett,et al.  HER3 as a biomarker of prognosis and panitumumab (Pan) benefit in RAS-wt advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) , 2015 .

[8]  M. Wiese,et al.  Meta-analysis of BRAF mutation as a predictive biomarker of benefit from anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  R. Butler,et al.  Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  M. Parmar,et al.  Evaluating many treatments and biomarkers in oncology: a new design. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[12]  Davide Corà,et al.  A molecularly annotated platform of patient-derived xenografts ("xenopatients") identifies HER2 as an effective therapeutic target in cetuximab-resistant colorectal cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[13]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  Paul D. Smith,et al.  AZD8931, an Equipotent, Reversible Inhibitor of Signaling by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, ERBB2 (HER2), and ERBB3: A Unique Agent for Simultaneous ERBB Receptor Blockade in Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  Patrick Royston,et al.  A Menu-Driven Facility for Sample-Size Calculation in Novel Multiarm, Multistage Randomized Controlled Trials with a Time-to-Event Outcome , 2009 .

[16]  J. Baselga,et al.  Novel anticancer targets: revisiting ERBB2 and discovering ERBB3 , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  P. Harari,et al.  Mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab: role of HER (ErbB) family members , 2008, Oncogene.

[18]  F. Cavalli,et al.  PTEN loss of expression predicts cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  Linda Mol,et al.  Sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (CAIRO): a phase III randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[20]  K. Shokat,et al.  Escape from HER family tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy by the kinase inactive HER3 , 2007, Nature.

[21]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[22]  P. Grambsch,et al.  Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals , 1994 .

[23]  R. Berardi,et al.  The role of HER-3 expression in the prediction of clinical outcome for advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving irinotecan and cetuximab. , 2011, The oncologist.

[24]  T. Hickish,et al.  Intermittent versus continuous oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  K. Pavelić,et al.  Expression of erbB-3 protein in colorectal adenocarcinoma: correlation with poor survival , 2000, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.