A confidential enquiry into emergency hospital admissions on the Isle of Wight, UK.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the proportion of potentially avoidable emergency short term admissions to hospital and to identify ways in which they could have been avoided. DESIGN: Confidential enquiry by peer review group. SETTING: St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight. SUBJECTS: All emergency, short term admissions (discharged home within five days) to medicine, general surgery, orthopaedics, gynaecology, ENT, and ophthalmology specialties for 28 (24 hour) days over a six month period in 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Appropriateness of admissions decided by the peer group, the peer group's opinion of ideal management, and the patients' views on the appropriateness of their admission. RESULTS: Altogether 139 cases satisfied the inclusion criteria. Complete data were collected on 123 cases and the peer group considered 81 in the time available. Twenty one of the 81 cases were judged "potentially avoidable". These represent 9.5% (95% CI 6.3%, 13.5%) of short term admissions to the specialties studied. The peer group considered that seven of 10 patients referred by a general practitioner (GP) could have been managed by the GP alone and that the remaining three had been referred appropriately but need not have been admitted had a consultant opinion been available in the accident and emergency (A&E) department. Two of the 10 would have required home support to avoid hospital admission. Five of 11 patients who referred themselves to A&E could have been discharged home without admission and without recourse to a specialist opinion. The remaining six could have been discharged had a consultant opinion been available in A&E. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent consultant opinion, either in A&E or in an outpatient clinic, would have prevented most of these inappropriate admissions, and home support would have expedited the ability to discharge some patients. Further research into the costs and benefits of methods for providing these services is needed urgently.

[1]  C Victor,et al.  The inappropriate use of acute hospital beds in an inner London District Health Authority. , 1993, Health trends.

[2]  K. Kahn,et al.  Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[3]  K. Kahn,et al.  Measuring the Clinical Appropriateness of the Use of a Procedure Can We Do It? , 1988, Medical care.

[4]  J. Coast,et al.  The hospital admissions study in England: are there alternatives to emergency hospital admission? , 1995, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[5]  J. Coast,et al.  Alternatives to hospital care: what are they and who should decide? , 1996, BMJ.

[6]  P. Gertman,et al.  A comparative analysis of appropriateness of hospital use. , 1984, Health affairs.

[7]  C. Cookson.  WHO to concentrate HIV strategy on vaginal microbicide. , 1993, BMJ.

[8]  C. Victor,et al.  Is hospital the right place? A survey of 'inappropriate' admissions to an inner London NHS trust. , 1994, Journal of public health medicine.

[9]  P. Gertman,et al.  The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol: A Technique for Assessing Unnecessary Days of Hospital Care , 1981, Medical care.

[10]  A. Gatherer,et al.  Use of hospital beds: a cohort study of admissions to a provincial teaching hospital. , 1988, BMJ.

[11]  R H Brook,et al.  A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical Technologies , 1986, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  L Hallam,et al.  Primary medical care outside normal working hours: review of published work , 1994, BMJ.

[13]  R H Brook,et al.  Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. , 1987, JAMA.

[14]  S. Kendrick.  Emergency admissions: what is driving the increase? , 1995, The Health service journal.

[15]  R. Klein,et al.  Impact of the 1990 contract for general practitioners on night visiting. , 1994, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.