Interaction of a DNA intercalator DRAQ5, and a minor groove binder SYTO17, with chromatin in live cells—Influence on chromatin organization and histone—DNA interactions

DNA‐binding dyes are useful in contrasting cell nuclei and chromatin for live cell fluorescence microscopy; however, they may interfere with nuclear and DNA structure and function. We investigated the influence exerted by two DNA dyes on chromatin and nuclear structure, as well as histone–DNA interactions in live HeLa cells. A membrane‐permeant fluorescent DNA intercalator DRAQ5 (anthracycline derivative), at a concentration of 1 μM, caused microscopically detectable changes of nuclear architecture. Following DRAQ5 intercalation into DNA, chromatin aggregated into distinct areas and foci. The loss of 3D chromatin distribution was exerted via interference with a dynamic exchange of a linker histone (H1), which is a known chromatin stabilizing factor. At higher concentrations (3 and 7.5 μM), DRAQ5 interfered with binding of H2B core histones to DNA. Similar effects resulted from intercalation of chemotherapeutic drugs, adriamycin and daunomycin, but were not observed after binding to DNA of a minor groove binder, Syto17. © 2008 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry

[1]  M. Zloh,et al.  Spectral analysis of the DNA targeting bisalkylaminoanthraquinone DRAQ5 in intact living cells , 2006, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[2]  J. Dobrucki,et al.  Scattering of exciting light by live cells in fluorescence confocal imaging: phototoxic effects and relevance for FRAP studies. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[3]  A Klug,et al.  Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  K. Fukui,et al.  H1.X with different properties from other linker histones is required for mitotic progression , 2007, FEBS letters.

[5]  Daria A Gaykalova,et al.  Transcription through chromatin by RNA polymerase II: histone displacement and exchange. , 2007, Mutation research.

[6]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  Toxicogenomics: overview and potential applications for the study of non-covalent DNA interacting chemicals. , 2007, Mutation research.

[7]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  Kinetics of Core Histones in Living Human Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  F. Thoma,et al.  Histone H1 expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae binds to chromatin and affects survival, growth, transcription, and plasmid stability but does not change nucleosomal spacing , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[9]  Heinrich Leonhardt,et al.  DNA labeling in living cells , 2005, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[10]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Dynamic binding of histone H1 to chromatin in living cells , 2000, Nature.

[11]  H. Kimura,et al.  Histone H1 variant, H1R is involved in DNA damage response. , 2007, DNA repair.

[12]  M. Hendzel,et al.  Rapid exchange of histone H1.1 on chromatin in living human cells , 2000, Nature.

[13]  T. Kanda,et al.  Histone–GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells , 1998, Current Biology.

[14]  Stephen Neidle,et al.  Principles of nucleic acid structure , 2007 .

[15]  P. Becker,et al.  Regulation of higher-order chromatin structures by nucleosome-remodelling factors. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[16]  D. Gewirtz,et al.  A critical evaluation of the mechanisms of action proposed for the antitumor effects of the anthracycline antibiotics adriamycin and daunorubicin. , 1999, Biochemical pharmacology.

[17]  N. Osheroff,et al.  DNA topoisomerase II, genotoxicity, and cancer. , 2007, Mutation research.