Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K-12 education

Emergency situations that cause damage to educational buildings or require the closure of schools due to unsafe health, environmental, or political conditions can be an unwelcomed interruption to education Indeed, the recent COVID‐19 pandemic created the largest disruption of education in history, affecting 94% of the world's student population In emergencies, technology is often utilised as part of a crisis response protocol by continuing education using emergency remote education (ERE) The purpose of this study is to determine how technology has been used to continue K‐12 learning remotely during an emergency This systematic review included an aggregated and configurative synthesis to examine extant empirical work over eleven years, from January 2010 to December 2020 Following a rigorous, PRISMA selection process, 60 articles were included in the final analysis from 48 countries Grounded coding of the strategies used for learning revealed the following categories: communication, delivery systems, student ERE readiness, partnerships, promoting student learning and engagement, and resources Grounded coding of the technologies revealed that types of technologies used were divided into two major categories: Internet‐based and non‐Internet based, with the majority using Internet‐based technologies Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic The COVID‐19 pandemic has caused school closures across the globe and prevented in‐person school teaching The rapid shift to distance education in schools can be conceptualised as ‘emergency remote education’ (ERE) Prior ERE research focused on bounded geographic locations where localised emergencies occurred What this paper adds This provides the scholarly community with a unique systematic review of existing academic research on K‐12 ERE implementation in emergencies This provides aggregated data and analysis on the past 11 years of the types of emergencies, participants, subject domain, technologies used, and location information This provides findings of the types of remote teaching strategies involving technology used to continue K‐12 learning in emergency situations This provides a set of recommendations on ERE for teachers, school leaders, policy makers, and funders This provides researchers with a review of the field with identification of gaps and future research opportunities Implications for practice and/or policy Recommendations regarding ERE are provided in this paper that will be of benefit to K‐12 teachers, school leaders policymakers, and funders in the continuing COVID‐19 pandemic and future emergencies The research gaps highlighted in this paper, such as the lack of studies conducted in low and low middle‐income countries, are presented with suggestions for much needed future research This can lead to changes in practice and policy What is already known about this topic The COVID‐19 pandemic has caused school closures across the globe and prevented in‐person school teaching The rapid shift to distance education in schools can be conceptualised as ‘emergency remote education’ (ERE) Prior ERE research focused on bounded geographic locations where localised emergencies occurred What this paper adds This provides the scholarly community with a unique systematic review of existing academic research on K‐12 ERE implementation in emergencies This provides aggregated data and analysis on the past 11 years of the types of emergencies, participants, subject domain, technologies used, and location information This provides findings of the types of remote teaching strategies involving technology used to continue K‐12 learning in emergency situations This provides a set of recommendations on ERE for teachers, school leaders, policy makers, and funders This provides researchers with a review of the field with identification of gaps and future research opportunities Implications for practice and/or policy Recommendations regarding ERE are provided in this paper that will be of benefit t K‐12 teachers, school leaders policymakers, and funders in the continuing COVID‐19 pandemic and future emergencies The research gaps highlighted in this paper, such as the lack of studies conducted in low and low middle‐income countries, are presented with suggestions for much needed future research This can lead to changes in practice and policy [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of British Journal of Educational Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use This abstract may be abridged No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract (Copyright applies to all Abstracts )

[1]  C. Pope,et al.  Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[2]  S. Hares,et al.  Practical lessons for phone-based assessments of learning , 2020, BMJ Global Health.

[3]  Kim M. Thompson,et al.  Inclusive considerations for optimal online learning in times of disasters and crises , 2020 .

[4]  Emma Anderson,et al.  Loss of brick-and-mortar schooling: how elementary educators respond , 2020 .

[5]  D. Silove,et al.  School factors related to the emotional wellbeing and resettlement outcomes of students from refugee backgrounds: protocol for a systematic review , 2019, Systematic Reviews.

[6]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Richard E. Ferdig,et al.  Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning , 2014 .

[8]  Luis Espino-Díaz,et al.  Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 on Education Professionals. Toward a Paradigm Shift: ICT and Neuroeducation as a Binomial of Action , 2020 .

[9]  A. Uzicanin,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges in Using Online Learning to Maintain Continuity of Instruction in K–12 Schools in Emergencies , 2020 .

[10]  E. J. Sintema,et al.  Effect of COVID-19 on the Performance of Grade 12 Students: Implications for STEM Education , 2020, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.

[11]  Giancarlo Iannizzotto,et al.  Remote Eye-Tracking for Cognitive Telerehabilitation and Interactive School Tasks in Times of COVID-19 , 2020, Inf..

[12]  Juliet Stoltenkamp,et al.  E-Learning tools for Public Awareness Programme Education in Disaster Risk Management: case study of the City of Cape Town Disaster Risk Management Centre , 2013 .

[13]  Gregory R. Simonson,et al.  A Systematic Review of School-Based Social-Emotional Interventions for Refugee and War-Traumatized Youth , 2016 .

[14]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Special Issue Editorial: Preservice and Inservice Professional Development During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020 .

[15]  Bodong Chen,et al.  Reading and connecting: using social annotation in online classes , 2020 .

[16]  Anita Priyadarshini,et al.  E-readiness of senior secondary school learners to online learning transition amid COVID-19 lockdown , 2020 .

[17]  S. Manca,et al.  Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries: Mapping Educational Science in the Discourse on Social Media , 2019, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[18]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[19]  Selcuk R. Sirin,et al.  Digital game-based education for Syrian refugee children: Project Hope , 2018 .

[20]  Ruchelle Combs Success Plan for the Online Learning Experience: Student Engagement, Teacher Accessibility, & Relationships , 2020 .

[21]  Hengtao Tang A Qualitative Inquiry of K–12 Teachers’ Experience with Open Educational Practices: Perceived Benefits and Barriers of Implementing Open Educational Resources , 2020, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.

[22]  Barbara Lockee,et al.  The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning , 2020 .

[23]  Erkan Yarımkaya,et al.  Promoting physical activity for children with autism spectrum disorders during Coronavirus outbreak: benefits, strategies, and examples , 2020, International journal of developmental disabilities.

[24]  P. Alexander Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews , 2020 .

[25]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Social distancing meet social media: digital tools for connecting students, teachers, and citizens in an emergency , 2020 .

[26]  Samuel W. G. Wilson,et al.  Support provided for K-12 teachers teaching remotely with technology during emergencies: A systematic review , 2021, Journal of Research on Technology in Education.

[27]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[28]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  OER Quality and Adaptation in K-12: Comparing Teacher Evaluations of Copyright-Restricted, Open, and Open/Adapted Textbooks , 2015 .

[29]  Bogum Yoon Global Education in Middle Grades: Editorial Remarks , 2020 .

[30]  Nobuko Fujita Transforming online teaching and learning: towards learning design informed by information science and learning sciences , 2020, Information and Learning Sciences.

[31]  Helen Crompton A Diachronic Overview of Mobile Learning: A Shift Toward Student-Centered Pedagogies , 2014 .

[32]  Educational inequalities in Europe and physical school closures during Covid-19 * Headlines , 2020 .

[33]  W. Burgess,et al.  Leveraging Community Partnerships to Engage Digitally Foreign Learners in Response to COVID-19 , 2020 .

[34]  H. Crompton,et al.  The Use of Technology to Continue Learning in Palestine Disrupted with COVID-19 , 2020 .

[35]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[36]  Ahmed Tlili,et al.  Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources , 2020, Smart Learning Environments.

[37]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[38]  David Seidenfeld,et al.  No Lost Generation: Supporting the School Participation of Displaced Syrian Children in Lebanon , 2019, The Journal of Development Studies.

[39]  Hengtao Tang,et al.  Understanding the Impact of OER Courses in Relation to Student Socioeconomic Status and Employment , 2020 .

[40]  M. Pai,et al.  An appeal for practical social justice in the COVID-19 global response in low-income and middle-income countries , 2020, The Lancet Global Health.

[41]  J. Szente Live Virtual Sessions with Toddlers and Preschoolers amid COVID-19: Implications for Early Childhood Teacher Education. , 2020 .

[42]  Ebba Ossiannilsson,et al.  A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis , 2020 .

[43]  Aras Bozkurt,et al.  Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic , 2020 .

[44]  Giorgi Basilaia,et al.  Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia , 2020, Pedagogical Research.

[45]  Guy M. Goodwin,et al.  Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2004, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[46]  H. Suri Ethical Considerations of Conducting Systematic Reviews in Educational Research , 2019, Systematic Reviews in Educational Research.

[47]  Mary Masterson An Exploration of the Potential Role of Digital Technologies for Promoting Learning in Foreign Language Classrooms: Lessons for a Pandemic , 2020, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[48]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Mapping the Mixed Methods–Mixed Research Synthesis Terrain , 2012, Journal of mixed methods research.