Factors related to seatbelt-wearing among rear-seat passengers in Malaysia.

The benefit of wearing a rear seatbelt in reducing the risk of motor vehicle crash-related fatalities and injuries has been well documented in previous studies. Wearing a seatbelt not only reduces the risk of injury to rear-seat passengers, but also reduces the risk of injury to front-seat occupant who could be crushed by unbelted rear-seat passengers in a motor vehicle crash. Despite the benefits of wearing a rear seatbelt, its rate of use in Malaysia is generally low. The objective of this study was to identify factors that are associated with the wearing of a seatbelt among rear-seat passengers in Malaysia. Multinomial logistic regression analysis of the results of a questionnaire survey of 1651 rear-seat passengers revealed that rear-seat passengers who were younger, male, single and less educated and who had a perception of a low level of legislation enforcement, a lower risk-aversion and less driving experience (only for passengers who are also drivers) were less likely to wear a rear seatbelt. There was also a significant positive correlation between driver seatbelt and rear seatbelt-wearing behaviour. This implies that, in regards to seatbelt-wearing behaviour, drivers are more likely to adopt the same seatbelt-wearing behaviour when travelling as rear-seat passengers as they do when driving. These findings are crucial to the development of new interventions to increase the compliance rate of wearing a rear seatbelt.

[1]  David Lester,et al.  Social integration and suicide in South Korea. , 2006, Crisis.

[2]  K Imberger,et al.  Learning to take risks: the influence of age and experience on risky driving behaviour in the ACT , 2004 .

[3]  Nebi Sümer,et al.  Personality and behavioral predictors of traffic accidents: testing a contextual mediated model. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  T Vaa,et al.  Increased police enforcement: effects on speed. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  U Tränkle,et al.  Risk perception and age-specific accidents of young drivers. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  J. Boyce,et al.  Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve , 1998 .

[7]  F Simon,et al.  Road traffic offending, stress, age, and accident history among male and female drivers. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[8]  A. Tomohara.  Imputing Unknown Market Values: A Different Perspective on the Disparity Between WTP and WTA , 2005 .

[9]  Dorothy Jean Begg,et al.  Seat-Belt Use and Related Behaviors Among Young Adults , 2000 .

[10]  Augustine J. Kposowa,et al.  Motor Vehicle Deaths among Men: Marital Status, Gender and Social Integration , 2009 .

[11]  H M Simpson,et al.  STUDY OF THE PROFILE OF HIGH-RISK DRIVERS , 1997 .

[12]  Farideh Ramjerdi,et al.  Gap between Willingness‐to‐Pay (WTP) and Willingness‐to‐Accept (WTA) Measures of Value of Travel Time: Evidence from Norway and Sweden , 2007 .

[13]  Peter Cummings,et al.  Passenger seating position and the risk of passenger death or injury in traffic crashes. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Why the WTA-WTP disparity matters , 1999 .

[15]  Jeremy Broughton.  The actual threat posed by unrestrained rear seat car passengers. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  B A Jonah,et al.  Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioral adaptation. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Thomas S. Dee,et al.  State alcohol policies, teen drinking and traffic fatalities , 1999 .

[18]  George Yannis,et al.  Multilevel modelling for the regional effect of enforcement on road accidents. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Esben Agerbo,et al.  Social integration and suicide: Denmark, 1906–2006 , 2011 .

[20]  C K Brown,et al.  Factors affecting injury severity to rear-seated occupants in rural motor vehicle crashes. , 2001, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[21]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  An index of loss aversion , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Analysis of the Effects of Speed Limit Enforcement Cameras: Differentiation by Road Type and Catchment Area , 2004 .

[23]  D. French,et al.  Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: an examination method and findings. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Carol Mansfield.  Despairing Over Disparities: Explaining the Difference Between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept , 1997 .

[25]  Goro Fujita,et al.  Method to evaluate the effect of safety belt use by rear seat passengers on the injury severity of front seat occupants. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  D Shinar,et al.  Self-reports of safe driving behaviors in relationship to sex, age, education and income in the US adult driving population. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  S. Wakai,et al.  Mortality of front-seat occupants attributable to unbelted rear-seat passengers in car crashes , 2002, The Lancet.

[28]  David W Eby,et al.  The effects of standard enforcement on Michigan safety belt use. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  E. Durkheim.  Suicide: A Study in Sociology , 1897 .

[30]  D. Umberson,et al.  Family status and health behaviors: social control as a dimension of social integration. , 1987, Journal of health and social behavior.

[31]  A I King,et al.  Research in biomechanics of occupant protection. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[32]  Norlen Mohamed,et al.  Seatbelt wearing compliance among road users in Putrajaya , 2009 .

[33]  Rosa Ferrer,et al.  Breaking the Law When Others Do: A Model of Law Enforcement with Neighborhood Externalities , 2008 .

[34]  Henrik Andersson,et al.  Willingness to pay for road safety and estimates of the risk of death: evidence from a Swedish contingent valuation study. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  William D. Schulze,et al.  The marginal value of job safety: A contingent valuation study , 1988 .

[36]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  Chung L. Huang,et al.  Dietary habits, demographics, and the development of overweight and obesity among children in the United States , 2005 .

[38]  Nathaniel C Briggs,et al.  Seat belt law enforcement and racial disparities in seat belt use. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[39]  R Norton,et al.  Motor vehicle driver injury and marital status: a cohort study with prospective and retrospective driver injuries , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[40]  Richard Kent,et al.  Rear-seat motor vehicle travel in the U.S.: using national data to define a population at risk. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[41]  P. Ulleberg,et al.  Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers , 2003 .

[42]  Ray G. Taylor,et al.  Age and gender differences in perceived accident likelihood and driver competences. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  James L Nichols,et al.  Primary enforcement seat belt laws are effective even in the face of rising belt use rates. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[44]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Attitudes towards traffic safety, driving behaviour and accident involvement among the Norwegian public , 2004, Ergonomics.

[45]  T. Lajunen,et al.  Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers' self-assessments , 1995 .

[46]  Lisa F. Berkman,et al.  Social Integration and Mortality: A Prospective Study of French Employees of Electricity of France-Gas of France , 2004 .

[47]  Teik Hua Law,et al.  Seat belt use among car users in Malaysia , 2004 .

[48]  Peter Cummings,et al.  Association of rear seat safety belt use with death in a traffic crash: a matched cohort study , 2007, Injury Prevention.

[49]  Hamish A Deery,et al.  Hazard and Risk Perception among Young Novice Drivers , 1999 .

[50]  Bobbi Jo Perkins,et al.  Attitudes toward a primary seat belt law among adults in a rural state with a secondary seat belt law. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[51]  L. Venkatachalam.  The contingent valuation method: a review , 2004 .

[52]  T. McDaniels,et al.  Reference points, loss aversion, and contingent values for auto safety , 1992 .

[53]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Reference-Dependent Valuations of Risk: Why Willingness-to-Accept Exceeds Willingness-to-Pay , 2011 .

[54]  A. Kposowa,et al.  Marital status and suicide in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[55]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Social-cognitive correlates of risky adolescent cycling behavior , 2010, BMC public health.

[56]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[57]  B A Jonah,et al.  Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[58]  Yoshihiko Takahashi,et al.  Social support and suicide in Japanese men and women - the Japan Public Health Center (JPHC)-based prospective study. , 2011, Journal of psychiatric research.

[59]  Erik Lindberg,et al.  PERCEIVED RISK, FEELINGS OF SAFETY AND WORRY ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT TRAVEL MODES. PILOT STUDY , 2000 .

[60]  Annette Leclerc,et al.  Social integration and mortality: a prospective study of French employees of Electricity of France-Gas of France: the GAZEL Cohort. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.