Irrigating fluid absorption and blood loss during transurethral resection of the prostate studied with a regular interval monitoring (RIM) method.

A method for the study of physiological events during transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR) is described. Measurements of volumetric irrigating fluid balance, blood loss, central venous pressure (CVP) as well as blood haemoglobin and serum levels of sodium and glycine were performed at 10-min intervals. This regular interval monitoring (RIM) method offers the possibility to retrospectively correlate changes that occur during TUR at discrete time intervals. In 20 patients undergoing TUR, irrigating fluid absorption occurred throughout the procedure although the risk of having an absorption increased 30 min after surgery commenced. Increase of blood loss coincided with intravascular but not with extravascular absorptions. If there was a rapid massive intravascular absorption of about 500 ml/10 min, the CVP increased greater than 2 mmHg. The total intraoperative blood loss was not greater in patients with large absorption volumes. RIM will detect absorption greater than the urine excretion in any given period of time. If absorption occurs during a limited time of the TUR, RIM allows a partial correction for the urinary excretion in the volumetric fluid balance.

[1]  R. Hahn Influence of variations in blood haemoglobin concentration on the calculation of blood loss and volumetric irrigating fluid balance during transurethral resection of the prostate. , 1987, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  G. Alván,et al.  Effect of cephapirin on tubular reabsorption of amino acids, uric acid and beta 2-microglobulin in man. , 1983, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[3]  H. Breivik,et al.  Changes in oncotic pressure, osmolality and electrolytes following transurethral resection of the prostate using glycine as irrigating solution. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[4]  T. Stephenson,et al.  Comparison between continuous flow and intermittent flow transurethral resection in 40 patients presenting with acute retention. , 1980, British journal of urology.

[5]  T. W. Brady,et al.  Observations on cardiac output, blood volume, central venous pressure, fluid and electrolyte changes in patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy. , 1970, The Journal of urology.

[6]  P. Madsen,et al.  Determination of absorption of irrigating fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate by means of radioisotopes. , 1969, The Journal of urology.

[7]  D. Limbert,et al.  Central Venous Pressure Monitoring During Transurethral Prostatectomy , 1969 .

[8]  L. Persky,et al.  ELECTROLYTE AND OSMOLALITY CHANGES ATTENDING ELECTRORESECTION. , 1965, Archives of surgery.

[9]  W. Bethard,et al.  Volumetric, gravimetric and radioisotopic determination of fluid transfer in transurethral prostatectomy. , 1958, Transactions. American Urological Association. Western Section.

[10]  L. Karafin,et al.  A study of irrigating medium extravasation during transurethral surgery. , 1957, The Journal of urology.

[11]  J. Robison,et al.  Dilutional hyponatremic shock: another concept of the transurethral prostatic resection reaction. , 1956, The Journal of urology.

[12]  L. Dobson,et al.  Volume of irrigating fluid transfer during transurethral prostatectomy, studied with radioisotopes. , 1955, The Journal of urology.

[13]  R. Hagstrom,et al.  Studies on fluid absorption during transurethral prostatic resection. , 1955, The Journal of urology.

[14]  C. D. Creevy Hemolytic reactions during transurethral prostatic resection. , 1947, The Journal of urology.