Estimation of multipath transmission parameters for quantitative ultrasound measurements of bone

When applying quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements to bone for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk, the multipath transmission of sound waves frequently occurs. In the last 10 years, the interest in separating multipath QUS signals for their analysis awoke, and led to the introduction of several approaches. Here, we compare the performances of the two fastest algorithms proposed for QUS measurements of bone: the modified least-squares Prony method (MLSP), and the space alternating generalized expectation maximization algorithm (SAGE) applied in the frequency domain. In both approaches, the parameters of the transfer functions of the sound propagation paths are estimated. To provide an objective measure, we also analytically derive the Cramér-Rao lower bound of variances for any estimator and arbitrary transmit signals. In comparison with results of Monte Carlo simulations, this measure is used to evaluate both approaches regarding their accuracy and precision. Additionally, with simulations using typical QUS measurement settings, we illustrate the limitations of separating two superimposed waves for varying parameters with focus on their temporal separation. It is shown that for good SNRs around 100 dB, MLSP yields better results when two waves are very close. Additionally, the parameters of the smaller wave are more reliably estimated. If the SNR decreases, the parameter estimation with MLSP becomes biased and inefficient. Then, the robustness to noise of the SAGE clearly prevails. Because a clear influence of the interrelation between the wavelength of the ultrasound signals and their temporal separation is observable on the results, these findings can be transferred to QUS measurements at other sites. The choice of the suitable algorithm thus depends on the measurement conditions.

[1]  G. L. Bretthorst,et al.  Bayesian estimation of the underlying bone properties from mixed fast and slow mode ultrasonic signals. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Matching pursuits with a wave-based dictionary , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  James G. Miller,et al.  Cancellous bone fast and slow waves obtained with Bayesian probability theory correlate with porosity from computed tomography. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Mark R Holland,et al.  Anomalous negative dispersion in bone can result from the interference of fast and slow waves. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  E. Bossy,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of ultrasound propagation through trabecular bone structures measured by synchrotron microtomography , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of human trabecular bone microstructure , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  J. Saniie,et al.  Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part I: Analysis and algorithms , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Gangming Luo,et al.  Ultrasound simulation in bone , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus Reflects the Mechanical Properties of Calcaneal Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  Decomposition of two-component ultrasound pulses in cancellous bone using modified least squares prony method--phantom experiment and simulation. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  K. Wear,et al.  The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of broadband ultrasound attenuation and backscatter coefficient in human calcaneus in vitro , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  G. L. Bretthorst,et al.  DECOMPOSITION OF INTERFERING ULTRASONIC WAVES IN BONE AND BONE‐MIMICKING MATERIALS , 2009 .

[13]  S. Palmer,et al.  The interaction of ultrasound with cancellous bone. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Signal Separation in the Frequency Domain for Quantitative Ultrasound Measurements of Bone , 2009 .

[15]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Attenuation in trabecular bone: A comparison between numerical simulation and experimental results in human femur. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M. Biot Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. II. Higher Frequency Range , 1956 .

[17]  K. Wear Estimation of fast and slow wave properties in cancellous bone using Prony's method and curve fitting. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Amir Manbachi,et al.  Slow and fast ultrasonic wave detection improvement in human trabecular bones using Golay code modulation. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Maurice A. Biot,et al.  Generalized Theory of Acoustic Propagation in Porous Dissipative Media , 1962 .

[20]  Ilan Ziskind,et al.  Maximum likelihood localization of multiple sources by alternating projection , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[21]  R. Strelitzki On the measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in the os calcis using short pulses , 1996 .

[22]  C. Langton,et al.  The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. , 1984, Engineering in medicine.

[23]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity of Trabecular Cubes Reflects Mainly Bone Density and Elasticity , 2014, Calcified Tissue International.

[24]  A. Hosokawa Development of a numerical cancellous bone model for finite-difference time-domain simulations of ultrasound propagation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound in bone - Part I , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  David K. Hsu,et al.  Experimental analysis of porosity-induced ultrasonic attenuation and velocity change in carbon composites , 1995 .

[27]  K. Wear Ultrasonic attenuation in human calcaneus from 0.2 to 1.7 MHz , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  Laurent Sedel,et al.  In Vitro Acoustic Waves Propagation in Human and Bovine Cancellous Bone , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[29]  J. A. Evans,et al.  The effect of bone structure on ultrasonic attenuation and velocity. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[30]  James A. Zagzebski,et al.  Ultrasound transmission measurements through the os calcis , 1991, Calcified Tissue International.

[31]  M. Biot Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid‐Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low‐Frequency Range , 1956 .

[32]  G. Schmitz,et al.  Model-based estimation of quantitative ultrasound variables at the proximal femur , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[33]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Variation of Ultrasonic Parameters With Microstructure and Material Properties of Trabecular Bone: A 3D Model Simulation , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Inverse problems in cancellous bone: estimation of the ultrasonic properties of fast and slow waves using Bayesian probability theory. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  K. Wear The dependence of time-domain speed-of-sound measurements on center frequency, bandwidth, and transit-time marker in human calcaneus in vitro. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? , 1998, Bone.

[37]  Keith A Wear,et al.  Cancellous bone analysis with modified least squares Prony's method and chirp filter: phantom experiments and simulation. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  E Ogam,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone using the Biot theory: inverse problem. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Wavelet-based signal processing of in vitro ultrasonic measurements at the proximal femur. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[40]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: An in vitro study , 1993, Osteoporosis International.

[41]  J. Rho,et al.  Low-megahertz ultrasonic properties of bovine cancellous bone. , 2000, Bone.

[42]  P. Laugier,et al.  In vitro measurement of the frequency-dependent attenuation in cancellous bone between 0.2 and 2 MHz. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  G. L. Bretthorst,et al.  Phase Velocity of Cancellous Bone: Negative Dispersion Arising from Fast and Slow Waves, Interference, Diffraction, and Phase Cancellation at Piezoelectric Receiving Elements , 2011 .

[44]  Ilan Ziskind,et al.  Detection of the number of coherent signals by the MDL principle , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[45]  P. Laugier,et al.  Velocity dispersion of acoustic waves in cancellous bone , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[46]  F. Padilla,et al.  A device for in vivo measurements of quantitative ultrasound variables at the human proximal femur , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[47]  J. A. Evans,et al.  An investigation of the measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in trabecular bone. , 1996, Ultrasonics.

[48]  P. Laugier,et al.  2A-6 Optimization Algorithm for Improved Quantitative Ultrasound Signal Processing at the Proximal Femur , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[49]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..