Evaluating Website Quality by Addressing Quality Gaps: A Modular Process

Quality is a mainstream issue for Websites and Web-based systems. Analysts, designers and developers can choose from a variety of models and methods to design and evaluate quality Websites. However, our experience, both as users and professionals, is too often disappointing. Besides usability, the most known of the factors contributing to a Website's quality, there are a large numbers of other features to take into account. Moreover, some of these features go beyond the scope of Computer Science and Information Systems. A systemic and systematic approach to Website quality evaluation has to take into account (1) the role of the Website for the company or organization and (2) a collection of requirements arising from the usually large number of different users of the Website. This paper investigates the application of an approach in which a Website's quality goals are described in terms of the elimination of quality gaps. The quality gaps are derived from a highly successful model for the quality of services widely applied in Economics and Management. The paper focuses on the need for a flexible evaluation process starting from the identification of the quality gaps. The result is a modular process including an initial set of guidelines extracted from projects run on more than fifteen years for Websites in diverse sectors.

[1]  Franca Garzotto,et al.  SUE inspection: an effective method for systematic usability evaluation of hypermedia , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[2]  N. Nayab.  Kaizen: The key to Japan‚s competitive success , 2009 .

[3]  Thea van der Geest.  Web Site Design Is Communication Design , 2001 .

[4]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[5]  Luisa Mich,et al.  Evaluating and designing Web site quality , 2003 .

[6]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age , 2005 .

[7]  W. Buxton.  Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Computing as a discipline , 1989, Computer.

[9]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[10]  Luca Botturi,et al.  MiLE : Systematic Usability Evaluation for E-learning Web Applications , 2004 .

[11]  Steve Hansen,et al.  Web Engineering: Creating a Discipline among Disciplines , 2001, IEEE Multim..

[12]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[13]  Luisa Mich,et al.  The 2QCV3Q Quality Model for the Analysiy of Web site Requirements , 2003, J. Web Eng..

[14]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  Provoking Creativity: Imagine What Your Requirements Could Be Like , 2004, IEEE Softw..

[15]  Luisa Mich,et al.  A Quality Gaps Roadmap for a Website Usability Process , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control & Automation.

[16]  Barbara Farbey,et al.  Exploring Requirements: Quality Before Design , 1991 .

[17]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  An Integrative Approach to the Assessment of E-Commerce Quality , 2002, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[18]  V. Zeithaml.  Delivering Quality Service , 1990 .

[19]  Gustavo Rossi,et al.  Web Quality , 2006, Web Engineering.

[20]  Luisa Mich,et al.  Applying a pragmatics-based creativity-fostering technique to requirements elicitation , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[21]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  Quality Planning and Analysis , 1981 .

[22]  Pablo Becker,et al.  Specifying Process Views for a Measurement, Evaluation, and Improvement Strategy , 2012, Adv. Softw. Eng..

[23]  A. Vieira.  Delivering Quality Service , 2005 .