Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Hoelzer. The good parent process of sexual selection , 1989, Animal Behaviour.
[2] R. Knapp,et al. Courtship as an honest indicator of male parental quality in the bicolor damselfish stegastes partitus , 1991 .
[3] Y. Iwasa,et al. Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher’s runaway process of sexual selection , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[4] D. Schluter,et al. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[5] Yoshinari Tanaka. SOCIAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF ANIMAL SIGNALS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[6] A. Møller. Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow , 1994 .
[7] Andrew Cockburn. An Introduction to Evolutionary Ecology , 1991 .
[8] G. Hill. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality , 1991, Nature.
[9] D. Schluter,et al. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits , 1993 .
[10] R. Montgomerie,et al. Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[11] P. David,et al. Male sexual ornament size but not asymmetry reflects condition in stalk–eyed flies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[12] A. P. Møller,et al. Sexual selection in the monogamous barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). II. Mechanisms of sexual selection , 1992 .
[13] A. Grafen. Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.
[14] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[15] Y. Iwasa,et al. Female Mate Preference to Maximize Paternal Care: A Two-Step Game , 1996, The American Naturalist.
[16] K. Norris. Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major , 1993, Nature.
[17] A. Pomiankowski. The costs of choice in sexual selection. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.
[18] J. Heywood. SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[19] G. Sætre,et al. Food provisioning in the pied flycatcher: do females gain direct benefits from choosing bright-coloured males? , 1995 .
[20] Y. Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[21] Y. Iwasa,et al. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[22] Shigeo Yachi. How can honest signalling evolve? The role of handicap principle , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[23] N. Burley. Sexual Selection for Aesthetic Traits in Species with Biparental Care , 1986, The American Naturalist.
[24] M. Andersson. EVOLUTION OF CONDITION‐DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCES , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[25] Yoh Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[26] Y. Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[27] Y. Iwasa,et al. Continual change in mate preferences , 1995, Nature.
[28] R. Johnstone. Honest signalling, perceptual error and the evolution of ‘all-or-nothing’ displays , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.