Asymmetrical contrast effects induced by luminance and color configurations

In the two experiments, the use of a psychophysical procedure of brightness/darkness cancellation shed light on interactions between spatial arrangement and figure-ground contrast in the perceptual filling in of achromatic and colored surfaces. Achromatic and chromatic Kanizsa squares with varying contrast, contrast polarity, and inducer spacing were used to test how these factors interact in the perceptual filling in of surface brightness or darkness. The results suggest that the neuronal processing of surfaces with apparent contrast, leading to figure-ground segregation (i.e., perceptual organization), is governed by mechanisms that integrate both luminance contrast and spatial information carried by the inducing stimuli, while discarding information on contrast polarity or color. The findings are discussed in relation to earlier observations on brightness assimilation and contrast. They support theories of nonantagonistic neural mechanisms suppressing local contrast or color signs in brightness-based figure-ground percepts. Such mechanisms might be necessary to cancel potentially conflicting polarities in geometrically complex visual stimuli so that perceptual filling in resulting in the most plausible representation of figure and ground can be achieved.

[1]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Contrast and assimilation in lightness judgments , 1966 .

[2]  Eric G. Heinemann,et al.  Simultaneous Brightness Induction , 1972 .

[3]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  The role of edges and line-ends in illusory contour formation , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  W. L. Brigner,et al.  Subjective Contour: Apparent Depth or Simultaneous Brightness Contrast? , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  C Bonnet,et al.  Apparent Brightness Enhancement in the Kanizsa Square with and without Illusory Contour Formation , 1990, Perception.

[6]  C. D. Weert The role of colours in the formation of subjective contours , 1983 .

[7]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Brightness contrast in the Ehrenstein illusion , 1976, Vision Research.

[8]  J. Hamada Overall brightness decrease observed in the Ehrenstein illusion induced for both contrast polarities , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  P. Whittle,et al.  Two separate neural mechanisms of brightness induction , 1992, Vision Research.

[10]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Phenomena of Illusory Form: Can We Bridge the Gap between Levels of Explanation? , 1995, Perception.

[11]  E. G. Heinemann,et al.  Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  L. Festinger,et al.  The effect of attention on brightness contrast and assimilation. , 1970, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  Birgitta Dresp,et al.  Local brightness mechanisms sketch out surfaces but do not fill them in: Psychophysical evidence in the Kanizsa square , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  P. Kellman,et al.  Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  R Shapley,et al.  Contrast and assimilation in the perception of brightness. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Finding out about filling-in: a guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[17]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985 .

[18]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Assimilation: Asymmetry between brightness and darkness? , 1995, Vision Research.

[19]  J. Hamada Lightness decrease and increase in square-wave grating , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  J. Frisby,et al.  Illusory Contours: Curious Cases of Simultaneous Brightness Contrast? , 1975 .