Business Engineering: Dynanic Modeling Instruments for a Dynamic World

In this article, Business Engineering (BE) is defined as the integral design of both organizational structures and information systems. A literature review shows that despite the numerous success stories, BE has so far achieved little theoretical and methodological support. A 4-year, action research project was started to overcome this problem. Dynamic modeling, a structured problem-solving approach for real-life problems using simulation, was taken as the initial intervention technique. Two BE case studies were carried out within the Amsterdam Municipal Police Force. Dynamic modeling together with practical experiences from the case studies and theoretical findings from fields such as system science, mathematical statistics, and socio-technical design were merged into a design approach, a design theory, and a set of automated tools for supporting, structuring, and guiding future BE efforts. The results of this project give outlook to a new and promising interdisciplinary research domain.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An evaluation of empirical research in managerial support systems , 1990, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[3]  E. A. Hall,et al.  How to Make Reengineering Really Work , 1994 .

[4]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[5]  G. Huber The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[6]  Raymond R. Panko,et al.  Is Office Productivity Stagnant? , 1991, MIS Q..

[7]  S. Roach Services under siege--the restructuring imperative. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[8]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[10]  Varun Grover,et al.  Information technology enabled business process redesign: An integrated planning framework , 1993 .

[11]  R. O. Knorr Business Process Redesign: Key to Competitiveness , 1991 .

[12]  Henry Mintzberg An Emerging Strategy of "Direct" Research , 1979 .

[13]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Management misinformation systems , 1967 .

[14]  Albert Cherns,et al.  Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisted , 1987 .

[15]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  The Principles of Sociotechnical Design , 1976 .

[16]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  Swedish Network Development for Implementing National Work Reform Strategy , 1993 .

[17]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The IS Expectation Gap: Industry Expectations Versus Academic Preparation , 1993, MIS Q..

[18]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The new productivity challenge. , 1991 .

[19]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[20]  M. Miles Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis , 1979 .

[21]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[22]  Michael Foster An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Action Research in Work Organizations , 1972 .

[23]  George P. Huber,et al.  The Decision-Making Paradigm of Organizational Design , 1986 .