Chapter 7.1 – Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise

Publisher Summary The World-Wide Failure Exercise (WWFE) contained a detailed assessment of 19 theoretical approaches to predict the deformation and failure response of polymer composite laminates when subjected to complex states of stress. The chapter presents the leading five theories, which are explored in greater detail to demonstrate their strengths and weaknesses in predicting the various types of structural failure. Recommendations are then derived as to how the theories can be best utilized to provide safe and economic predictions in a wide range of engineering design applications. Further guidance is provided for designers on the level of confidence and bounds of applicability of the current theories. The need for careful interpretation of initial failure predictions is emphasized, as is the need to allow for multiple sources of nonlinearity, (including progressive damage) where accuracy is sought for certain classes of large deformation and final failure strength predictions. Aspects requiring further experimental and theoretical investigation are identified. Direction is also provided to the research community by highlighting specific, tightly focused, experimental and theoretical studies that, if carried out in the very near future, would pay great dividends from the designer's perspective, by increasing their confidence in the theoretical foundations.

[1]  E. C. Edge Stress-based Grant-Sanders method for predicting failure of composite laminates , 1998 .

[2]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  A continuum damage model for transverse matrix cracking in laminated fibre–reinforced composites , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  A. Rotem,et al.  PREDICTION OF LAMINATE FAILURE WITH THE ROTEM FAILURE CRITERION 1 This article represents the author , 1998 .

[4]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise , 1998 .

[5]  C. Sun,et al.  The prediction of failure envelopes and stress/strain behavior of composite laminates: comparison with experimental results , 2002 .

[6]  L. J. Hart-Smith,et al.  Predictions of a generalized maximum-shear-stress failure criterion for certain fibrous composite laminates , 1998 .

[7]  Andrew C. Hansen,et al.  Composite laminate failure analysis using multicontinuum theory , 2004 .

[8]  L. McCartney,et al.  PREDICTING TRANSVERSE CRACK FORMATION IN CROSS-PLY LAMINATES 1 This article represents the author's , 1998 .

[9]  Andrew C. Hansen,et al.  A comparison of multicontinuum theory based failure simulation with experimental results , 2004 .

[10]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  A progressive quadratic failure criterion, part B , 2002 .

[11]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Evaluation of failure prediction in composite laminates: background to ‘part B’ of the exercise , 2002 .

[12]  Levon Minnetyan,et al.  Application of progressive fracture analysis for predicting failure envelopes and stress–strain behaviors of composite laminates: a comparison with experimental results , 2002 .

[13]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CURRENT FAILURE THEORIES FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES , 1998 .

[14]  Ludmilla P. Tairova,et al.  The strength of multilayered composites under a plane-stress state , 1998 .

[15]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Biaxial test results for strength and deformation of a range of E-glass and carbon fibre reinforced composite laminates: failure exercise benchmark data , 2002 .

[16]  L. J. Hart-Smith,et al.  Predictions of the original and truncated maximum-strain failure models for certain fibrous composite laminates , 1998 .

[17]  L. N. McCartney,et al.  Prediction of ply crack formation and failure in laminates , 2002 .

[18]  Carl-Gustaf Aronsson,et al.  Strength of Tensile Loaded Graphite/Epoxy Laminates Containing Cracks, Open and Filled Holes , 1990 .

[19]  Tarunjit S. Butalia,et al.  A strain-energy-based non-linear failure criterion: comparison of numerical predictions and experimental observations for symmetric composite laminates , 2002 .

[20]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CURRENT FAILURE THEORIES FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES, JUDGED AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE , 2002 .

[21]  H. Schürmann,et al.  FAILURE ANALYSIS OF FRP LAMINATES BY MEANS OF PHYSICALLY BASED PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS , 1998 .

[22]  James F. Newill,et al.  Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates , 2004 .

[23]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  A PROGRESSIVE QUADRATIC FAILURE CRITERION FOR A LAMINATE 1 This article represents the authors' cont , 1998 .

[24]  Zheng-Ming Huang,et al.  Correlation of the bridging model predictions of the biaxial failure strengths of fibrous laminates with experiments , 2004 .

[25]  R. Cuntze,et al.  The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multi-directional laminates—part B , 2004 .

[26]  A. Rotem,et al.  The Rotem failure criterion: theory and practice , 2002 .

[27]  C. Sun,et al.  Prediction of failure envelopes and stress/strain behaviour of composite laminates 1 This article re , 1998 .

[28]  G. Eckold,et al.  FAILURE CRITERIA FOR USE IN THE DESIGN ENVIRONMENT 1 This article represents the author's contributi , 1998 .

[29]  L. J. Hart-Smith,et al.  Comparison between theories and test data concerning the strength of various fibre–polymer composites , 2002 .

[30]  Tarunjit S. Butalia,et al.  A strain-energy based failure criterion for non-linear analysis of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loading , 1998 .

[31]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: additional contributions , 2004 .

[32]  Levon Minnetyan,et al.  Prediction of composite laminate fracture: micromechanics and progressive fracture , 1998 .

[33]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates , 1998 .

[34]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A further assessment of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: comparison with experimental evidence , 2004 .

[35]  Zheng-Ming Huang,et al.  A bridging model prediction of the ultimate strength of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loads , 2004 .

[36]  James F. Newill,et al.  Predicting the Nonlinear Response and Failure of Composite Laminates: Correlation With Experimental Results , 2004 .

[37]  E. C. Edge,et al.  A comparison of theory and experiment for the stress-based Grant-Sanders method , 2002 .

[38]  L. J. Hart-Smith,et al.  Expanding the capabilities of the Ten-Percent Rule for predicting the strength of fibre–polymer composites , 2002 .

[39]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Modelling Interlaminar and Intralaminar Damage in Filament-Wound Pipes under Quasi-Static Indentation , 2002 .