Patient, Provider, and Practice Characteristics Associated With Sacubitril/Valsartan Use in the United States

Background Current guidelines recommend sacubitril/valsartan for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but the rate of adoption in the United States has been slow. Methods and Results Using data from CHAMP-HF (Change the Management of Patients With Heart Failure), we described current sacubitril/valsartan use and identified patient, provider, and practice characteristics associated with its use. We considered patients to be on sacubitril/valsartan if they were prescribed it before enrollment or initiated on it at the baseline visit. We excluded patients with a contraindication to sacubitril/valsartan and practices with <10 patients enrolled. Of 4216 patients from 121 sites, 616 (15%) were prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, 2506 (59%) an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and 1094 (26%) neither. Patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan were younger (63 years versus 66 years ACE inhibitor/ARB versus 69 years neither, P<0.001), less likely to have chronic kidney disease (15% versus 17% ACE inhibitor/ARB versus 30% neither, P<0.001), more likely to have cardiac resynchronization therapy (12% versus 7% ACE inhibitor/ARB versus 7% neither, P<0.001), and had lower ejection fraction (27% versus 30% ACE inhibitor/ARB versus 30% neither, P<0.001). Larger practices, based on number of cardiologists and advanced practice providers, were associated with the highest sacubitril/valsartan use. After multivariable adjustment, the number of advanced practice providers was associated with sacubitril/valsartan use (adjusted odds ratio,1.08; 95% CI, 1.03–1.14). Conclusions Despite current guideline recommendations, adoption of sacubitril/valsartan remains low. Provider and practice characteristics associated with sacubitril/valsartan use were related to general practice size and were not associated with practice characteristics specific for heart failure. Further research is needed to identify strategies for effective quality improvement interventions in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

[1]  G. Fonarow,et al.  Contemporary Patterns of Medicare and Medicaid Utilization and Associated Spending on Sacubitril/Valsartan and Ivabradine in Heart Failure. , 2019, JAMA cardiology.

[2]  J. H. Patterson,et al.  Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The CHAMP-HF Registry. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. H. Patterson,et al.  Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Enrolled in the CHAMP‐HF Registry Compared With Patients Enrolled in the PARADIGM‐HF Trial , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[4]  P. Martens,et al.  Insights into implementation of sacubitril/valsartan into clinical practice , 2018, ESC heart failure.

[5]  N. Shah,et al.  Adoption of Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Management of Patients With Heart Failure , 2018, Circulation. Heart failure.

[6]  Gerasimos S Filippatos,et al.  2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Wing W. Chan,et al.  Change the management of patients with heart failure: Rationale and design of the CHAMP‐HF registry , 2017, American heart journal.

[8]  Emily C. O'Brien,et al.  Early Adoption of Sacubitril/Valsartan for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF). , 2017, JACC. Heart failure.

[9]  R. Sacco,et al.  ACC/AHA Special Report: Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Strategies A Summary of Systematic Reviews by the NHLBI Implementation Science Work Group A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2017, Circulation.

[10]  S. Solomon,et al.  Potential Mortality Reduction With Optimal Implementation of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor Therapy in Heart Failure. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[11]  R. Nelson,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Combination Therapy Compared With Enalapril for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[12]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Joshua T. Cohen,et al.  Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Paul A. Heidenreich,et al.  Improving Guideline Adherence: A Randomized Trial Evaluating Strategies to Increase &bgr;-Blocker Use in Heart Failure , 2003, Circulation.