Modeling Multimodal Freight Transportation Network Performance underDisruptions

To facilitate a region’s freight transportation systems planning and operations and minimize the risk associated with increasing multimodal freight movements, this study presents a modeling framework for evaluating and optimizing freight flows on a multimodal transportation network under disruption. Unexpected events such as earthquakes, floods, and other manmade or natural disasters would cause significant economic losses. When parts of the transportation network are closed or operated at a reduced capacity, the delay of commodity movements would further increase such losses. Shifting to an alternative route or mode might help to mitigate the negative impacts. In this study, a multimodal freight transportation network was developed to simulate commodity movements, evaluate the impacts of disruptions, and develop effective emergency operation plans. A fluid-based dynamic queuing approximation was used to estimate the delays at classification yards and locks caused by disruption. Using the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) database, a case study was constructed to model the transportation of cereal grains from Iowa to other states. Three hypothetical disruption scenarios were tested: a reduced service level at locks along the Mississippi River, a bridge outage on I-80 at the Missouri River, and severe weather in central Iowa closing the Union Pacific tracks in the area. The impacts of these disruptions were quantified and analyzed using the presented freight network model.

[1]  Peter Kolesar,et al.  Some Effects of Nonstationarity on Multiserver Markovian Queueing Systems , 1991, Oper. Res..

[2]  M. C. Holcomb,et al.  Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience , 2009 .

[3]  Bart Jourquin,et al.  Freight transportation demand elasticities: a geographic multimodal transportation network analysis , 2001 .

[4]  Paul Schonfeld,et al.  Metamodels for estimating waterway delays through series of queues , 1998 .

[5]  Samir Aknine,et al.  Coordination of Supply Chain Activities: A Coalition-Based Approach , 2008, Virtual Enterprises and Collaborative Networks.

[6]  K. Meyer The Output of a Queueing System , 1981 .

[7]  Sammi Y. Tang,et al.  On the benefits of operational flexibility in a distribution network with transshipment , 2011 .

[8]  Markus Bohlin,et al.  Hump Yard Track Allocation with Temporary Car Storage , 2010 .

[9]  T. J. Kim,et al.  Economic impacts of transportation network changes: Implementation of a combined transportation network and input-output model , 2002 .

[10]  Alain Martel,et al.  The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Dynamic Network Simulation–Assignment Platform for Multiproduct Intermodal Freight Transportation Analysis , 2007 .

[12]  Lance R Grenzeback,et al.  Case Study of the Transportation Sector's Response to and Recovery from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita , 2008 .

[13]  Christopher P. L. Barkan,et al.  Improving Railroad Classification Yard Performance Through Bottleneck Management Methods , 2006 .

[14]  Teodor Gabriel Crainic,et al.  A Multimode Multiproduct Network Assignment Model for Strategic Planning of Freight Flows , 1987, Transp. Sci..

[15]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  The role of transport flexibility in logistics provision , 2006 .

[16]  M Beuthe,et al.  TRANSPORTATION POLICY ANALYSIS WITH A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM: THE VIRTUAL NETWORK OF FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION IN EUROPE. IN: TRANSPORT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1996 .

[17]  Kevin McCormack,et al.  Supply Chain Risk in Turbulent Environments – A Conceptual Model for Managing Supply Chain Network Risk , 2009 .

[18]  Olga Lingaitiene,et al.  A mathematical model of selecting transport facilities for multimodal freight transportation , 2008 .

[19]  Jean-Marc Rousseau,et al.  A Tactical Planning Model for Rail Freight Transportation , 1984, Transp. Sci..

[20]  Chung-Cheng Lu Evaluation of Intermodal Freight Transportation Network Performance Under Disruptions: Analytical Fluid-Based Approximation Approach , 2012 .

[21]  R. Ballou Business Logistics Management , 1991 .

[22]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence , 2004 .

[23]  Malur K. Sundareshan,et al.  Numerical Methods for Modeling Computer Networks Under Nonstationary Conditions , 1990, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[24]  C James Kruse,et al.  America's Locks & Dams: "A Ticking Time Bomb for Agriculture?" , 2011 .

[25]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Freight modelling: an overview of international experiences , 2008 .

[26]  Jari Collin,et al.  Plan for supply chain agility at Nokia Lessons from the mobile infrastructure industry , 2006 .

[27]  Clark Cheng,et al.  Simulation and analysis of railroad hump yards in North America , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[28]  Tschangho John Kim,et al.  Implementation and estimation of a combined model of interregional, multimodal commodity shipments and transportation network flows , 2005 .