Transcendental Metadata: A Collaborative Schema for Electronic Resource Description

Academic libraries are attempting to manage growing collections of diverse electronic resources in a chaotic environment of evolving standards and systems. The transition from a print-dominated resource environment to an electronic one has complicated the decision-making process. Current discourse primarily focuses on meeting patron needs and has distracted researchers from looking at librarian needs. The authors discovered that librarians want a better understanding of the nature, extent, and diversity of electronic resources for decision making, assessment, and accountability. Drawing from the collaborative methods and design philosophies of other disciplines, this paper outlines an approach to leveraging Web 2.0 philosophy and Business Intelligence techniques to address these needs. This approach will serve as a guide for academic librarians to transcend their current practices in order to develop innovative, collaborative, and holistic approaches to the joint stewardship of library electronic resource collections.

[1]  W. H. Inmon,et al.  Building the data warehouse , 1992 .

[2]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[3]  Marshall Breeding The many facets of managing electronic resources , 2004 .

[4]  Isto Huvila,et al.  What is Library 2.0? , 2009, J. Documentation.

[5]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[6]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Requirements engineering: a roadmap , 2000, ICSE '00.

[7]  L. Buchanan,et al.  A brief history of decision making. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[8]  Andrew K. Pace,et al.  Toward a Twenty-First Century Library Catalog , 2006 .

[9]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Jill E. Grogg Investing in Digital. , 2007 .

[11]  T. Zillner,et al.  Review of The Social Life of Information by John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press , 2000 .

[12]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[13]  Adam Murray,et al.  Electronic Resource Management 2.0: Using Web 2.0 Technologies As Cost-Effective Alternatives To An Electronic Resource Management System , 2008 .

[14]  C. Martell The Absent User : Physical Use of Academic Library Collections and Services Continues to Decline 1995-2006 , 2008 .

[15]  Doug Way,et al.  The Impact of Web-scale Discovery on the Use of a Library Collection , 2010 .

[16]  Bill Hostmann,et al.  Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence Platforms , 2012 .

[17]  David Margaret Eric David Cristian Mihai Woolwine,et al.  Folksonomies, Social Tagging and Scholarly Articles / Les folksonomies, l'étiquetage social et les articles scientifiques , 2011 .

[18]  Denise Pan Not A One-Size-Fits-All Solution: Lessons Learned From Implementing An Electronic Resources Management System in Three Days , 2009 .

[19]  G. Sonntag,et al.  No Longer the Sacred Cow - No Longer a Desk: Transforming Reference Service to Meet 21st Century User Needs , 2007 .