Sustainability reporting quality and the financial sector: evidence from China

Purpose Based on institutional theory, this paper aims to examine whether, and if so which, institutional forces influence the quality of China’s listed financial institutions’ (FIs) sustainability disclosures. Design/methodology/approach Using univariate statistical and multiple regression analyses, this study quantitatively examines the impacts of coercive pressure from the government and stock exchanges, imitation within subsectors and normative pressure from industry associations and regulators on the quality of China’s listed FIs’ sustainability disclosures. Assessment of the robustness of regression results uses panel random-effects and generalized methods of moments estimation. Findings Financial sector corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure quality did not increase dramatically following issue of the “Guiding Opinions on Establishing a Green Finance System.” However, a convergence in quality is found over time. State ownership concentration and state links to dominant shareholders negatively impact the quality of financial sector sustainability disclosures, whereas stock exchange index listing requirements and industry association reporting guidance have positive influences. Research limitations/implications First, data availability limits the sample to listed financial firms with RKS quality scores. Thus, results may not be generalizable to the broader listed and unlisted financial sector. Second, this study only examines the influence of external forces based on institutional theory. However, internal institutional forces, such as corporate governance, may require examination. This study’s results indicate that coercive pressure, as represented by issue of the “Green Finance” policy, has not yet prompted the financial sector to improve reporting quality; however, normative pressure has had significant influence in influencing FIs’ CSR practices, with China’s banks potentially taking a leading role. Originality/value The financial sector has a lower direct environmental impact than traditional polluting industries and different operating and reporting structures, features often used to argue for its exclusion in prior studies. However, its indirect environmental impact via lending and investing activities is significant, suggesting evidence on the determinants of sustainability disclosure quality is required. This study uses evidence from China’s financial sector to reduce this gap in the literature.

[1]  A. Mollik,et al.  “Green washing” or “authentic effort”? An empirical investigation of the quality of sustainability reporting by banks , 2020 .

[2]  Shidi Dong,et al.  China’s financial sector sustainability and “green finance” disclosures , 2020 .

[3]  Lei Xu,et al.  Mixed-Ownership Reform and Private Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: Evidence From China , 2020, Business & Society.

[4]  Artie Ng,et al.  Sustainability accounting, management and policy in China: recent developments and future avenues , 2020, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.

[5]  Giorgio Mion,et al.  The Effect of Mandatory Publication of Nonfinancial Disclosure in Europe on Sustainability Reporting Quality: First Insights about Italian and German Companies , 2020 .

[6]  Stergios Leventis,et al.  The impact of religiosity and corruption on CSR reporting: The case of U.S. banks , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[7]  Ma Zhong,et al.  Do CSR Ratings Converge in China? A Comparison Between RKS and Hexun Scores , 2019, Sustainability.

[8]  M. C. Branco,et al.  Controversial sectors in banks’ sustainability reporting , 2019, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[9]  A. Chalmers,et al.  Financial volatility and public scrutiny as institutional determinants of financial industry firms' CSR , 2019, Business and Politics.

[10]  M. Asutay,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic Banking Sector , 2018 .

[11]  H. Khan,et al.  What drives green banking disclosure? An institutional and corporate governance perspective , 2018 .

[12]  S. Young,et al.  Seeking Legitimacy through CSR Reporting: Evidence from China , 2018 .

[13]  Sheng Yao,et al.  Soft or hard information? A trade-off selection of environmental disclosures by way of peer imitation and geographical distance , 2018 .

[14]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting , 2017 .

[15]  J. Paredes-Gázquez,et al.  Corporate social performance and its relation with corporate financial performance: International evidence in the banking industry , 2017 .

[16]  Chung-Hua Shen,et al.  Application of multi-level matching between financial performance and corporate social responsibility in the banking industry , 2017 .

[17]  O. Weber.  Equator Principles reporting: factors influencing the quality of reports , 2017 .

[18]  Anna Rowe,et al.  Emerging phenomenon of corporate social and environmental reporting in China , 2017 .

[19]  Olaf Weber,et al.  Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance of Chinese Banks , 2017 .

[20]  I. García‐Sánchez,et al.  CSR Engagement and Earnings Quality in Banks. The Moderating Role of Institutional Factors , 2017 .

[21]  L. Ferri.  The influence of the institutional context on sustainability reporting. A cross-national analysis , 2017 .

[22]  S. Sethi,et al.  An Evaluation of the Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports by Some of the World’s Largest Financial Institutions , 2017 .

[23]  X. Luo,et al.  Whose Call to Answer: Institutional Complexity and Firms’ CSR Reporting , 2017 .

[24]  Dejia Li,et al.  Market Reactions to the First-Time Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Evidence from China , 2016 .

[25]  F. Querci,et al.  The Quality of Disclosures on Environmental Policy: The Profile of Financial Intermediaries , 2016 .

[26]  Chung-Hua Shen,et al.  To engage or not to engage in corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from global banking sector , 2016 .

[27]  C. Lau,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Corporate Governance Approach , 2014, Journal of Business Ethics.

[28]  Shidi Dong,et al.  The impact of explicit CSR regulation: evidence from China’s mining firms , 2016 .

[29]  Na Zhao,et al.  An exploratory analysis of managerial perceptions of social and environmental reporting in China , 2016 .

[30]  Giovanna Michelon,et al.  CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis , 2015 .

[31]  R. Zurbruegg,et al.  The Effectiveness of Capital Regulation on Bank Behavior in China , 2015 .

[32]  Haitao Yin,et al.  Community Institutions and Initial Diffusion of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in China's Banking Industry , 2015, Management and Organization Review.

[33]  B. Scholtens,et al.  Toward a theory of responsible investing : On the economic foundations of corporate social responsibility , 2015 .

[34]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Evaluating practices and drivers of corporate social responsibility: the Chinese context , 2015 .

[35]  R. Craig,et al.  A review of Chinese and English language studies on corporate environmental reporting in China , 2015 .

[36]  Lu Tang,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Communication Through Corporate Websites , 2015 .

[37]  Vítor Hugo Vilar,et al.  CSR disclosure on the web: major themes in the banking sector , 2015 .

[38]  Peter Seele,et al.  Analyzing Sector‐Specific CSR Reporting: Social and Environmental Disclosure to Investors in the Chemicals and Banking and Insurance Industry , 2015 .

[39]  R. Wolniak,et al.  Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states , 2015, Quality & Quantity.

[40]  Shidi Dong,et al.  Salient stakeholders in corporate social responsibility reporting by Chinese mining and minerals companies , 2014 .

[41]  S. Zeng,et al.  The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical study in China. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[42]  A. Salama,et al.  Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector , 2013, Journal of Business Ethics.

[43]  J. E. Navas-López,et al.  Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance , 2014 .

[44]  Olaf Weber,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility of the Financial Sector – Strengths, Weaknesses and the Impact on Sustainable Development , 2014 .

[45]  A. Andrikopoulos,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Financial Institutions: Evidence from Euronext , 2014 .

[46]  H. Jo,et al.  Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Financial Services Sector , 2014, Journal of Business Ethics.

[47]  Yingjun Lu,et al.  Stakeholders Power, Corporate Characteristics and Social and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from China , 2014 .

[48]  Olaf Weber,et al.  The financial sector's impact on sustainable development , 2014 .

[49]  Maria Mazzuca,et al.  Sustainability Report and Bank Valuation: Evidence from European Stock Markets , 2014 .

[50]  Chung-Hua Shen,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance , 2013 .

[51]  C. Tam,et al.  Factors that Drive Chinese Listed Companies in Voluntary Disclosure of Environmental Information , 2012 .

[52]  Efthymios Gravas,et al.  Company Characteristics and Environmental Policy , 2012 .

[53]  Maria Mazzuca,et al.  Corporate Social Reporting in European Banks: The Effects on a Firm's Market Value , 2012 .

[54]  Lei Xu,et al.  Do Internal Governance Mechanisms Impact on Firm Performance? Empirical Evidence from the Financial Sector in China , 2012 .

[55]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance? , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Y. Shan,et al.  Corporate governance mechanisms and financial performance in China: panel data evidence on listed non financial companies , 2011 .

[57]  M. Soana.  The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance in the Banking Sector , 2011 .

[58]  A. Amran,et al.  Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: a case of a developing country , 2011 .

[59]  Jun Bi,et al.  An empirical study on the driving mechanism of proactive corporate environmental management in China. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[60]  J. Guthrie,et al.  The Chinese Government's Formal Institutional Influence On Corporate Environmental Management , 2010 .

[61]  Robin W. Roberts,et al.  Toward a More Coherent Understanding of the Organization–Society Relationship: A Theoretical Consideration for Social and Environmental Accounting Research , 2010 .

[62]  T. Woodward,et al.  CSR reporting and the UK financial services sector , 2009 .

[63]  Bert Scholtens,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in the International Banking Industry , 2009 .

[64]  V. Anbumozhi,et al.  Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed company , 2009 .

[65]  J. Moon,et al.  'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[66]  M. Muñoz-Torres,et al.  Analysis of Social Performance in the Spanish Financial Industry Through Public Data. A Proposal , 2006 .

[67]  Lúcia Lima Rodrigues,et al.  Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: A legitimacy theory perspective , 2006 .

[68]  L. Parker.  Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box , 2005 .

[69]  D. Cormier,et al.  Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? , 2005 .

[70]  C. Deegan.  Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation , 2002 .

[71]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[72]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[73]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[74]  M. Matei.  Social Responsibility in the Financial and Banking Sector , 2013 .

[75]  C. Noronha,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: An Overview and Comparison with Major Trends , 2013 .