Ash dieback and other tree pests and pathogens: dispersed risk events and the Social Amplification of Risk Framework

Abstract It is widely acknowledged within the risk literature that the mass media play a pivotal role in shaping information about risk events for audiences. While some risk events reflect occurrences specific to particular times and locations, other risk events are more difficult to temporally and spatially situate as they are dispersed across years or months and are not constrained to particular geographic locations. Studies examining the relationship between the social amplification or attenuation of risks and their framing in the media have tended to focus on the former type of event. In this paper, we explore the social amplification of risk in relation to ash dieback disease (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus), a tree health issue that attracted intense media attention in the United Kingdom in 2012, and characterise what we designate as a dispersed risk event. Drawing on the influential Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF), we present a frame analysis of UK national newspaper articles to assess the connection between media coverage of dieback and risk amplification, and the extent to which dieback coverage drew on other tree health issues and objects of media attention. Focusing particularly on the blame frame around dieback, the paper considers the implications of conceptualising dispersed risk events for the SARF and its amplification metaphor. Moreover, given that risk events such as dieback are often associated with policy shifts, we suggest that there is value for risk communicators and policymakers in broadening their focus to incorporate more of the ‘history’ of risk events in order to anticipate likely anchors of public and media attention.Abbreviations: BSE: bovine spongiform encephalopathy; Defra: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; DED: Dutch elm disease; EAB: Emerald ash borer; EU: European Union; FMD: foot and mouth disease; FC: Forestry Commission; GSBB : Great spruce bark beetle; HCLM: Horse chestnut leaf miner; HTA: Horticultural Trades Association; OPM: Oak processionary moth; SARF: Social Amplification of Risk Framework; TPP: tree pests and pathogens

[1]  Julie Barnett,et al.  The social amplification of risk and the hazard sequence: the October 1995 oral contraceptive pill scare , 2003 .

[2]  Baldwin Van Gorp,et al.  Where is the Frame? Victims and Intruders in the Belgian Press Coverage of the Asylum Issue , 2005 .

[3]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[4]  E. Boa,et al.  Ash dieback in the UK: a wake-up call. , 2013, Molecular plant pathology.

[5]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Risk communication and the social amplification of risk , 1991 .

[6]  H. Joffe.  Public apprehension of emerging infectious diseases: are changes afoot? , 2011, Public understanding of science.

[7]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory , 2003 .

[8]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the ontological status of the concept of risk , 2011 .

[9]  Jon Heuch.  What lessons need to be learnt from the outbreak of Ash Dieback Disease, Chalara fraxinea in the United Kingdom? , 2014 .

[10]  W. B.,et al.  Foot and mouth disease. , 2002, Research in veterinary science.

[11]  I. Convery,et al.  Different public health geographies of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic: 'citizen' versus 'professional' epidemiology. , 2006, Health & place.

[12]  Shari R. Veil,et al.  Risk communication and social media , 2017 .

[13]  P. '. Hart,et al.  Symbols, Rituals and Power: The Lost Dimensions of Crisis Management , 1993 .

[14]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[15]  E. Rosa.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Meta theoretical foundations and policy implications , 2003 .

[16]  M. Douglas.  Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory , 1994 .

[17]  Alison Anderson,et al.  Framing risk: nanotechnologies in the news , 2010 .

[18]  A. Mol,et al.  Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology , 1994, Social studies of science.

[19]  Yu Jie Ng,et al.  To fear or not to fear? Applying the social amplification of risk framework on two environmental health risks in Singapore , 2018 .

[20]  Jenny Kitzinger,et al.  Audiences and readership research , 2004 .

[21]  Matthias Kohring,et al.  The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity , 2008 .

[22]  D. Bengston,et al.  An Analysis of Public Attitudes, Beliefs, and Values Expressed in the News Media , 1999 .

[23]  Richard Baker,et al.  The UK Plant Health Risk Register: a tool for prioritizing actions , 2014 .

[24]  J. Utikal,et al.  The oak processionary moth: a new health hazard? , 2015, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[25]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[26]  R. Kasperson.  The social amplification of risk: progress in developing an integrative framework of risk’, in S. , 1992 .

[27]  Karla K. Gower,et al.  How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisis news coverage , 2009 .

[28]  How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010-2012? , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[29]  U. Beck.  WORLD AT RISK , 2008 .

[30]  Emma Hughes,et al.  The media and risk , 2006 .

[31]  Matthias Kohring,et al.  The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication , 2008 .

[32]  Douglas M. McLeod,et al.  A Multiperspectival Approach to Framing Analysis: A Field Guide , 2001 .

[33]  S. Driedger,et al.  Risk and the Media: A Comparison of Print and Televised News Stories of a Canadian Drinking Water Risk Event , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  Graham Murdock,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: After amplification: rethinking the role of the media in risk communication , 2003 .

[35]  C. Hood,et al.  What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? , 2007 .

[36]  I. Tomlinson.  The discovery of ash dieback in the UK: the making of a focusing event , 2016 .

[37]  A. Vercauteren,et al.  Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of the European A2 isolates of Phytophthora ramorum , 2011, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[38]  Itzhak Yanovitzky,et al.  Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions , 2002, Commun. Res..

[39]  Jörg Matthes,et al.  What's in a Frame? A Content Analysis of Media Framing Studies in the World's Leading Communication Journals, 1990-2005 , 2009 .

[40]  A. Downs.  Up and Down with Ecology--The Issue Attention Cycle , 1972 .

[41]  S. Iyengar.  Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[42]  A. Chadwick.  The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power , 2013 .

[43]  J. Tulloch,et al.  Risk, health and the media , 2011 .

[44]  Helen R. Bayliss,et al.  Awareness, concern and willingness to adopt biosecure behaviours: public perceptions of invasive tree pests and pathogens in the UK , 2017, Biological Invasions.

[45]  Roger E. Kasperson,et al.  Communicating risks to the public : international perspectives , 1991 .

[46]  Christopher E. Clarke,et al.  The Blame Frame: Media Attribution of Culpability About the MMR–Autism Vaccination Scare , 2012, Health communication.

[47]  Cherie D. Maestas,et al.  Shifting the Blame: Federalism, Media, and Public Assignment of Blame Following Hurricane Katrina , 2008 .

[48]  Matthias Kohring,et al.  The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: how the German press framed modern biotechnology , 2002, Public understanding of science.

[49]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Expertise , 2003 .

[50]  J. Kitzinger.  Media templates: patterns of association and the (re)construction of meaning over time , 2000 .

[51]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Forest community response to invasive pathogens: the case of ash dieback in a British woodland , 2016 .

[52]  T. Leschine.  Oil Spills and the Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk , 2002 .

[53]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[54]  M. Davis.  "Is it Going to be Real?" Narrative and Media on a Pandemic , 2014 .

[55]  J. Kitzinger.  Researching risk and the media , 1999 .

[56]  M. Messner,et al.  Media Frames and Displacement of Blame in the Don Imus/Rutgers Women's Basketball Team Incident: Sincere Fictions and Frenetic Inactivity , 2012 .

[57]  Baldwin Van Gorp,et al.  The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In , 2007 .

[58]  M. Callon,et al.  Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy , 2009 .

[59]  Michael J. O. Pocock,et al.  The Success of the Horse-Chestnut Leaf-Miner, Cameraria ohridella, in the UK Revealed with Hypothesis-Led Citizen Science , 2014, PloS one.

[60]  D. Bengston,et al.  Roads on the U.S. National Forests , 1999 .

[61]  Debbie Evans,et al.  Hospitals in trouble , 1985 .

[62]  J. Barnett,et al.  The social amplification of risk on Twitter: the case of ash dieback disease in the United Kingdom , 2018 .

[63]  Erik Knain,et al.  Intertextuality for Handling Complex Environmental Issues , 2016 .

[64]  William J. Burns,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications , 1992 .

[65]  The Effect of Newspaper Coverage of Influenza on the Rate of Physician Visits for Influenza 2002–2008 , 2012 .

[66]  Thomas Kirisits,et al.  Ash dieback: pathogen spread and diurnal patterns of ascospore dispersal, with special emphasis on Norway. , 2011 .