Combined Use of Automatic Tube Voltage Selection and Current Modulation with Iterative Reconstruction for CT Evaluation of Small Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Effect on Lesion Conspicuity and Image Quality

Objective To assess the lesion conspicuity and image quality in CT evaluation of small (≤ 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) using automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS) and automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) with or without iterative reconstruction. Materials and Methods One hundred and five patients with 123 HCC lesions were included. Fifty-seven patients were scanned using both ATVS and ATCM and images were reconstructed using either filtered back-projection (FBP) (group A1) or sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) (group A2). Forty-eight patients were imaged using only ATCM, with a fixed tube potential of 120 kVp and FBP reconstruction (group B). Quantitative parameters (image noise in Hounsfield unit and contrast-to-noise ratio of the aorta, the liver, and the hepatic tumors) and qualitative visual parameters (image noise, overall image quality, and lesion conspicuity as graded on a 5-point scale) were compared among the groups. Results Group A2 scanned with the automatically chosen 80 kVp and 100 kVp tube voltages ranked the best in lesion conspicuity and subjective and objective image quality (p values ranging from < 0.001 to 0.004) among the three groups, except for overall image quality between group A2 and group B (p = 0.022). Group A1 showed higher image noise (p = 0.005) but similar lesion conspicuity and overall image quality as compared with group B. The radiation dose in group A was 19% lower than that in group B (p = 0.022). Conclusion CT scanning with combined use of ATVS and ATCM and image reconstruction with SAFIRE algorithm provides higher lesion conspicuity and better image quality for evaluating small hepatic HCCs with radiation dose reduction.

[1]  J. Remy,et al.  Clinical evaluation of automatic tube voltage selection in chest CT angiography , 2013, European Radiology.

[2]  Christoph Thomas,et al.  Clinical evaluation and potential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography angiography. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[3]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Low-kilovoltage, high-tube-current MDCT of liver in thin adults: pilot study evaluating radiation dose, image quality, and display settings. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Dianna D Cody,et al.  Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  Joon Koo Han,et al.  Attenuation-based automatic tube voltage selection and tube current modulation for dose reduction at contrast-enhanced liver CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[6]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Variation in tube voltage for adult neck MDCT: effect on radiation dose and image quality. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Michael J Pentecost,et al.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[8]  J. W. Vieira,et al.  CALDose_X—a software tool for the assessment of organ and tissue absorbed doses, effective dose and cancer risks in diagnostic radiology , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Nils Dahlström,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Abdominal Computed Tomography , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  T. Flohr,et al.  Sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in head CT: improvement of objective and subjective image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[11]  K. Macura,et al.  Facts and controversies about radiation exposure, part 2: low-level exposures and cancer risk. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[12]  C. Hildebolt,et al.  Effects of automated kilovoltage selection technology on contrast-enhanced pediatric CT and CT angiography. , 2013, Radiology.

[13]  Kemin Chen,et al.  Differentiation of small hepatic hemangioma from small hepatocellular carcinoma: recently introduced spectral CT method. , 2011, Radiology.

[14]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[15]  Sae Rom Hong,et al.  Combined use of automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction technique in coronary CT angiography. , 2013, Radiology.

[16]  Frank Dong,et al.  Optimization of kVp and mAs for pediatric low-dose simulated abdominal CT: is it best to base parameter selection on object circumference? , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Yong Eun Chung,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction via Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction and Automatic Tube Voltage Modulation (CARE kV) in Abdominal CT , 2013, Korean journal of radiology.

[18]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Radiation Dose from Computed Tomography in Patients with Necrotizing Pancreatitis: How Much Is Too Much? , 2010, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[20]  B. Choi,et al.  Low tube voltage intermediate tube current liver MDCT: sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  C. Hildebolt,et al.  Automated Low-Kilovoltage Selection in Pediatric Computed Tomography Angiography: Phantom Study Evaluating Effects on Radiation Dose and Image Quality , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[23]  Greta Toncheva,et al.  Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[24]  M. Kalra,et al.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[25]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Automated Attenuation-Based Tube Potential Selection for Thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography Angiography: Improved Dose Effectiveness , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[26]  Varut Vardhanabhuti,et al.  Assessment of Image Quality on Effects of Varying Tube Voltage and Automatic Tube Current Modulation With Hybrid and Pure Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in Abdominal/Pelvic CT: A Phantom Study , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[27]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Combining automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection and iterative reconstruction: a liver phantom study , 2014, European Radiology.

[29]  D J Brenner,et al.  Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology: the impact of new epidemiological data. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[30]  Bo Liu,et al.  Can Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative (SAFIRE) Reconstruction Improve Imaging Quality on Low-Dose Lung CT Screening Compared With Traditional Filtered Back Projection (FBP) Reconstruction? , 2013, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[31]  D. Brenner,et al.  Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[32]  H Alkadhi,et al.  Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[33]  Bernhard Schmidt,et al.  Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. , 2004, Radiology.

[34]  C. Nishida,et al.  Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies , 2004, The Lancet.

[35]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Ultralow-Dose Chest CT: Comparison of Pulmonary Nodule Detectability With the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[37]  P. Hou,et al.  Use of non-linear image blending with dual-energy CT improves vascular visualization in abdominal angiography. , 2014, Clinical radiology.

[38]  L. Gordon,et al.  MDCT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis using attenuation-based automated tube voltage selection in combination with iterative reconstruction: an intrapatient study of radiation dose and image quality. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.