The influence of contextual diversity on word learning

In a series of analyses over mega datasets, Jones, Johns, and Recchia (Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 115–124, 2012) and Johns et al. (Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132:2, EL74-EL80, 2012) found that a measure of contextual diversity that takes into account the semantic variability of a word’s contexts provided a better fit to both visual and spoken word recognition data than traditional measures, such as word frequency or raw context counts. This measure was empirically validated with an artificial language experiment (Jones et al.). The present study extends the empirical results with a unique natural language learning paradigm, which allows for an examination of the semantic representations that are acquired as semantic diversity is varied. Subjects were incidentally exposed to novel words as they rated short selections from articles, books, and newspapers. When novel words were encountered across distinct discourse contexts, subjects were both faster and more accurate at recognizing them than when they were seen in redundant contexts. However, learning across redundant contexts promoted the development of more stable semantic representations. These findings are predicted by a distributional learning model trained on the same materials as our subjects.

[1]  R. Solomon,et al.  Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Broadbent De Word-frequency effect and response bias. , 1967 .

[3]  D. Broadbent Word-frequency effect and response bias. , 1967, Psychological review.

[4]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[5]  G. Bower Organizational factors in memory. , 1970 .

[6]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[7]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. , 1977 .

[8]  E. Shoben,et al.  Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials , 1983 .

[9]  Patricia A. Herman,et al.  Learning Words from Context. , 1985 .

[10]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human memory: An adaptive perspective. , 1989 .

[11]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Poisson mixtures , 1995, Natural Language Engineering.

[13]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  The latent semantic analysis theory of knowledge , 1997 .

[14]  W T Maddox,et al.  Direct and indirect stimulus-frequency effects in recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  M. Humphreys,et al.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[16]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Testing the Distributioanl Hypothesis: The influence of Context on Judgements of Semantic Similarity , 2001 .

[17]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[18]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .

[19]  Kenneth J. Malmberg,et al.  The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Henk G Schmidt,et al.  Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  W S Murray,et al.  Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis. , 2004, Psychological review.

[22]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Contextual Diversity, Not Word Frequency, Determines Word-Naming and Lexical Decision Times , 2006, Psychological science.

[23]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[24]  Brendan T. Johns,et al.  Predicting Word-Naming and Lexical Decision Times from a Semantic Space Model , 2008 .

[25]  J. Elman On the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  The Associative Structure of Language: Contextual Diversity in Early Word Learning. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[27]  Brendan T. Johns,et al.  Evaluating the random representation assumption of lexical semantics in cognitive models , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Contextual Variability in Free Recall. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[29]  Brendan T. Johns,et al.  The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. , 2012, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[30]  Brendan T. Johns,et al.  Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Angela B Nelson,et al.  The co-evolution of knowledge and event memory. , 2013, Psychological review.

[32]  T. Rogers,et al.  Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[33]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  The influence of contextual variability on word learning , 2014, CogSci.

[34]  Jon A. Willits,et al.  Models of Semantic Memory , 2015 .

[35]  P. Hoffman,et al.  Opposing Effects of Semantic Diversity in Lexical and Semantic Relatedness Decisions , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.