An Integrated Evaluation Approach for E-Learning Systems in Career and Technical Education

As E-learning is gaining popularity in higher education, its evaluation becomes more critical than ever, to ensure the achievement of intended learning outcome. The effectiveness of E-learning system evaluation under current practices, however, remains questionable. One reason for such uncertainty is the lack of direct measurement while learning occurs since most evaluation data is collected after the learning process. Thus this chapter proposes an integrated evaluation approach for E-learning systems based on Cognitive Load Theory and grounded in the 4C/ID-model. Both direct and indirect measurements will be deployed in the integrated approach in the context of cognitive load. Furthermore all evaluation data can be translated into practical E-learning design solutions by triangulating with the 4C/ID-model. This chapter also suggests that future evaluation framework on E-learning should include factors from attitudinal and social aspects of learning process.

[1]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[2]  Ravi S. Behara,et al.  Outcome-Driven Experiential Learning with Web 2.0 , 2007, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[3]  F. Paas,et al.  A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction , 2005 .

[4]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[5]  Aubteen Darabi,et al.  Instructional Efficiency of Performance Analysis Training for Learners at Different Levels of Competency in Using a Web-Based EPSS. , 2008 .

[6]  R. Mason,et al.  Using Web 2.0 for learning in the community , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  Jon C. Marshall,et al.  Examination of a learning style topology , 1987 .

[8]  D. Leutner,et al.  Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[9]  James W. Smither,et al.  Empowered self‐development and continuous learning , 1999 .

[10]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[11]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Research and trends in the field of e-learning from 2001 to 2005: A content analysis of cognitive studies in selected journals , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[12]  F. Paas,et al.  Modality and Variability as Factors in Training the Elderly , 2006 .

[13]  Gurmak Singh,et al.  Implementing eLearning Programmes for Higher Education: A Review of the Literature , 2004, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[14]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[15]  P. Federico Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction , 2000 .

[16]  Yoany Beldarrain,et al.  Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration , 2006 .

[17]  Krista E. DeLeeuw,et al.  A Comparison of Three Measures of Cognitive Load: Evidence for Separable Measures of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Load , 2008 .

[18]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era , 2007 .

[19]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[20]  Ian W. Ricketts,et al.  The Prospects for E‐Learning Revolution in Education: A philosophical analysis , 2008 .

[21]  Robin Mason,et al.  Use of innovative technologies on an e-learning course , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  A. Grasha,et al.  Integrating Teaching Styles and Learning Styles with Instructional Technology , 2000 .

[23]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..