Values as truisms:evidence and implications

Three experiments tested the general hypothesis that values are cultural truisms-that is, beliefs that are widely shared and rarely questioned. Experiment 1 examined specifically whether people lack cognitive support for their values. It was predicted and found that analyzing one's reasons for particular values caused the values to change, a finding that would be expected only if individuals lack cognitive support for their values. Experiment 2 verified that analyzing reasons caused value change only when participants were not provided with cognitive support for their values. Experiment 3 found that the effect of analyzing reasons generalized across a range of ind vidual-differences variables. Experiment 3 also showed that analyzing reasons resulted in value ratings that were less predictive of relevant attitudes than pre-reasons-analysis value ratings, but only for high self-monitors.

[1]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  On the Relationship between Attitudes and Values: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Self-Monitoring and Self-Monitoring Schematicity , 1995 .

[2]  James M. Olson,et al.  Relations between Values, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intentions: The Moderating Role of Attitude Function , 1995 .

[3]  G. Maio,et al.  The Formation of Attitudes Toward New Immigrant Groups , 1994 .

[4]  James M. Olson,et al.  Value—attitude‐behaviour relations: The moderating role of attitude functions , 1994 .

[5]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. , 1993 .

[6]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspecting about Reasons can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction , 1993 .

[7]  C. Batson,et al.  Religion and the Individual: A Social-Psychological Perspective , 1993 .

[8]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[9]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Self-perception of humor: Evidence for discounting and augmentation effects. , 1992 .

[10]  M. Zanna,et al.  Value Relevance and the Value-Attitude Relation: Value Expressiveness Versus Halo Effects , 1991 .

[11]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[12]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Cognitive dissonance and self-monitoring: A matter of context? , 1989 .

[13]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object , 1989 .

[14]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta-analysis , 1989 .

[15]  Dalmas A. Taylor,et al.  Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy. , 1989 .

[16]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. , 1988 .

[17]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 1988 .

[18]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation , 1988 .

[19]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Justifying attitudes by appealing to values: A functional perspective , 1988 .

[20]  S. Briggs,et al.  On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity. , 1988 .

[21]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The Self and social life , 1987 .

[22]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism , 1986 .

[23]  A. Tesser,et al.  Thought-induced attitude change: The effects of schema structure and commitment. , 1986 .

[24]  S. Gangestad,et al.  On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Gregory M. Herek,et al.  The Instrumentality of Attitudes: Toward a Neofunctional Theory. , 1986 .

[26]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning , 1986 .

[27]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  The Self-Consciousness Scale: A revised version for use with general populations. , 1985 .

[28]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Affective-cognitive consistency and thought-induced attitude polarization. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  D. Jackson,et al.  Idiographic measurement strategies for personality and prediction: Some unredeemed promissory notes , 1985 .

[30]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. , 1985 .

[31]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude–behavior consistency. , 1984 .

[32]  E. Pedhazur.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .

[33]  D. Forsyth.  A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. , 1980 .

[34]  M. Robbins,et al.  Attitudes and Values: A Further Test of the Semantic Memory Model. , 1979, The Journal of social psychology.

[35]  J. Gold,et al.  A Semantic Memory Approach to the Conceptualization of Attitudes and Values , 1977 .

[36]  Christopher Leone,et al.  Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change , 1977 .

[37]  M. Rokeach.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[38]  R. Frondizi,et al.  What Is Value , 1972 .

[39]  Verling C. Troldahl,et al.  A Short-Form Dogmatism Scale for Use in Field Studies , 1965 .

[40]  M. Rokeach.  Book Reviews: The Open and Closed Mind. Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems , 1961 .

[41]  W. Mcguire,et al.  The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[42]  D. Katz.  THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[43]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[44]  James M. Olson,et al.  Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. , 2000 .

[45]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Attitude structure and function. , 1998 .

[46]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments , 1996 .

[47]  Neal J. Roese,et al.  Rankings, ratings, and the measurement of values: evidence for the superior validity of ratings , 1996 .

[48]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Involvement and persuasion: Evidence for different types of involvement , 1995 .

[49]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Origins of attitude importance: self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[51]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. , 1993 .

[52]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. , 1993 .

[53]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[54]  N. Rescher.  A system of pragmatic idealism , 1992 .

[55]  M. Zanna,et al.  Self-inference processes in emotion. , 1990 .

[56]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  Operationalizing functional theories of attitude. , 1989 .

[57]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: the Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why we Feel the Way we Do , 1989 .

[58]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[59]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior , 1986 .

[60]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[61]  J. B. Mcconahay,et al.  Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. , 1986 .

[62]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Psychological perspectives on the self , 1982 .

[63]  M. Snyder,et al.  Self-monitoring: The self in action , 1982 .

[64]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[65]  S. Schwartz.  Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .

[66]  Influence,et al.  Perspectives on social power , 1974 .

[67]  R. Gorsuch,et al.  Beliefs, attitudes, and values , 1968 .

[68]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook. , 1968 .

[69]  M. Rokeach,et al.  Political and religious dogmatism: An alternative to the authoritarian personality. , 1956 .

[70]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .