Epidemiological typing of Moraxella catarrhalis by pulsed field gel electrophoresis.

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (pfge) was used to compare 59 strains of Moraxella catarrhalis to evaluate pfge for the epidemiological typing of this organism. pfge-generated patterns were compared with those obtained by small fragment restriction enzyme analysis (rea) and species-specific probe hybridization. The strains used in the study were isolated from various geographic locations and included proven epidemiologically related strains. pfge yielded more unique patterns than dna-dna hybridization - 30 versus 18, respectively - but fewer than rea, which generated 45 unique patterns. Strains that demonstrated the same rea pattern or dna-dna hybridization pattern did not always demonstrate the same pfge pattern. For example, in 23 epidemiologically unrelated strains that shared six rea patterns, pfge differentiated the isolates into 12 patterns. Conversely, strains that demonstrated the same pfge pattern did not always demonstrate the same rea pattern or hybridization pattern. For example, in 42 strains that shared 13 pfge patterns, rea differentiated the isolates into 31 patterns and dna-dna hybridization differentiated them into 16 patterns. However, compared with rea, pfge yielded less complex patterns that were more easily comparable, and compared with dna-dna hybridization, pfge was technically easier.

[1]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[2]  K. Singh,et al.  Typing of group B streptococci: comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and conventional electrophoresis , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[3]  P. H. Roy,et al.  Epidemiological typing of Moraxella catarrhalis by using DNA probes , 1993, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  A. Matlow,et al.  Molecular epidemiological characterization of respiratory isolates of Moraxella catarrhalis in a pediatric intensive care unit. , 1992, The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses.

[5]  V. Peiris,et al.  Rapid method for differentiating strains of Branhamella catarrhalis. , 1992, Journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  K. Singh,et al.  DNA fingerprinting of Enterococcus faecium by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis may be a useful epidemiologic tool , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[7]  E. Denamur,et al.  Esterase electrophoresis: a molecular tool for studying the epidemiology of Branhamella catarrhalis nosocomial infection , 1989, Epidemiology and Infection.

[8]  L. Harvill,et al.  Phenotypic characteristics of Branhamella catarrhalis strains , 1989, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[9]  M. Zervos,et al.  Evaluation of restriction endonuclease analysis as an epidemiologic typing system for Branhamella catarrhalis , 1989, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  J. Musser,et al.  Evolutionary genetics of the encapsulated strains of Haemophilus influenzae. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Zervos,et al.  A nosocomial outbreak of Branhamella catarrhalis confirmed by restriction endonuclease analysis. , 1988, The Journal of infectious diseases.