Fluorescent-increase kinetics of different fluorescent reporters used for qPCR depend on monitoring chemistry, targeted sequence, type of DNA input and PCR efficiency

AbstractThe analysis of quantitative PCR data usually does not take into account the fact that the increase in fluorescence depends on the monitoring chemistry, the input of ds-DNA or ss-cDNA, and the directionality of the targeting of probes or primers. The monitoring chemistries currently available can be categorized into six groups: (A) DNA-binding dyes; (B) hybridization probes; (C) hydrolysis probes; (D) LUX primers; (E) hairpin primers; and (F) the QZyme system. We have determined the kinetics of the increase in fluorescence for each of these groups with respect to the input of both ds-DNA and ss-cDNA. For the latter, we also evaluated mRNA and cDNA targeting probes or primers. This analysis revealed three situations. Hydrolysis probes and LUX primers, compared to DNA-binding dyes, do not require a correction of the observed quantification cycle. Hybridization probes and hairpin primers require a correction of −1 cycle (dubbed C-lag), while the QZyme system requires the C-lag correction and an efficiency-dependent C-shift correction. A PCR efficiency value can be derived from the relative increase in fluorescence in the exponential phase of the amplification curve for all monitoring chemistries. In case of hydrolysis probes, LUX primers and hairpin primers, however, this should be performed after cycle 12, and for the QZyme system after cycle 19, to keep the overestimation of the PCR efficiency below 0.5 %. FigureThe qPCR monitoring chemistries form six groups with distinct fluorescence kinetics. The displacement of the amplification curve depends on the chemistry, DNA input and probe-targeting. The observed shift in Cq values can be corrected and PCR efficiencies can be derived.

[1]  I. Nazarenko,et al.  Detection of telomerase activity utilizing energy transfer primers: comparison with gel- and ELISA-based detection. , 1999, BioTechniques.

[2]  D. Whitcombe,et al.  Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  P. Ikonomi,et al.  Multiplex quantitative PCR using self-quenched primers labeled with a single fluorophore. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  Jan Hellemans,et al.  Evaluation of qPCR curve analysis methods for reliable biomarker discovery: bias, resolution, precision, and implications. , 2013, Methods.

[5]  C. Wittwer,et al.  Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. , 1997, BioTechniques.

[6]  R. Kitchen,et al.  Design and optimization of reverse-transcription quantitative PCR experiments. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  I. Nazarenko,et al.  A closed tube format for amplification and detection of DNA based on energy transfer. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Michael W Pfaffl,et al.  The ongoing evolution of qPCR. , 2010, Methods.

[9]  A. Moorman,et al.  Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Lyndon Gommersall,et al.  Basic principles of real-time quantitative PCR , 2005, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[11]  Frans Voorbraak,et al.  Bias in the Cq value observed with hydrolysis probe based quantitative PCR can be corrected with the estimated PCR efficiency value. , 2010, Methods.

[12]  S. Marras.  Interactive Fluorophore and Quencher Pairs for Labeling Fluorescent Nucleic Acid Hybridization Probes , 2008, Molecular biotechnology.

[13]  D S Dimitrov,et al.  The limit of PCR amplification. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  V. Beneš,et al.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  M. Kubista,et al.  Light-up probes: thiazole orange-conjugated peptide nucleic acid for detection of target nucleic acid in homogeneous solution. , 2000, Analytical biochemistry.

[16]  Sanjay Tyagi,et al.  Molecular Beacons: Probes that Fluoresce upon Hybridization , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  R. Abramson,et al.  Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5'----3' exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  T. Applegate,et al.  Diagnosis and Monitoring of PML-RARα -Positive Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia by Quantitative RT-PCR , 2006 .

[19]  C. Fuery,et al.  MNAzyme qPCR with superior multiplexing capacity. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  F. Bloom,et al.  Quantitation of gene expression in neural precursors by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction using self-quenched, fluorogenic primers. , 2003, Analytical biochemistry.