Inclusion of risk in evaluation of advanced technologies

Traditional economic evaluation techniques are often used to rank the technology alternatives for adoption purposes. However, the results of such evaluations are somewhat misleading since these techniques ignore the intangibles. Intangibles are factors that cannot be quantified for inclusions in the economic evaluation techniques but have great impact on the evaluation and adoption process. The current research addresses this issue by first identifying the intangible costs or risks of adopting a new technology and then developing a mechanism for their inclusion in the evaluation process. Taguchi loss functions are used as a tool for quantifying the intangible costs. The loss functions are developed based on the risks’ specification limits set by the decision maker. These loss functions are used to calculate a loss score for each technology candidate. The technology alternatives are then ranked based on their loss scores, and the technology with the lowest loss score is selected for adoption. The proposed methodology offers a powerful tool for evaluation of alternative technologies by complementing the traditional economic evaluation techniques.

[1]  Sherry D. Ryan,et al.  Considering Social Subsystem Costs and Benefits in Information Technology Investment Decisions: A View from the Field on Anticipated Payoffs , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  R. Stewart,et al.  IT/IS projects selection using multi‐criteria utility theory , 2002 .

[3]  Stuart Maguire,et al.  Identifying risks during information system development: managing the process , 2002, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[4]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Managing risk in software development projects: a case study , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[5]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  The Impact of Computer Alienation on Information Technology INvestment Decisions: An Exploratory Cross-National Analysis , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  Kit Fai Pun,et al.  Exploring soft versus hard factors for TQM implementation in small and medium‐sized enterprises , 2006 .

[7]  Dimitrios A. Georgakellos,et al.  TECHNOLOGY SELECTION FROM ALTERNATIVES: A SCORING MODEL FOR SCREENING CANDIDATES IN EQUIPMENT PURCHASING , 2005 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[9]  Ville Harkke,et al.  Impacts of physicians' usage of a mobile information system , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Heal..

[10]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Adoption of mobile technology in business: a fit-viability model , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[11]  Zahir Irani,et al.  The Propagation of Technology Management Taxonomies for Evaluating Investments in Information Systems , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Peter Enderwick,et al.  A cognitive model on attitude towards technology adoption , 2000 .

[13]  Pedro M. Reyes,et al.  RFID in the contemporary supply chain: multiple perspectives on its benefits and risks , 2008 .

[14]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[15]  Shengnan Han,et al.  Physicians' acceptance of mobile communication technology: an exploratory study , 2006, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[16]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Characteristics and impacts of ICT investments: perceptions among managers , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[17]  Peter Jones,et al.  The benefits, challenges and impacts of radio frequency identification technology (RFID) for retailers in the UK , 2005 .

[18]  Christine T. Ennew,et al.  Weapons of mass instruction? The rhetoric and reality of online learning , 2006 .

[19]  Sharon M. Ordoobadi OPPORTUNITY COSTS OF RISKS IN EVALUATION OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES , 2007 .

[20]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Evaluation methodologies for technology selection , 2000 .

[21]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information technology evaluation: classifying indirect costs using the structured case method , 2004, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[22]  John H. Sheesley,et al.  Quality Engineering in Production Systems , 1988 .

[23]  Deborah Barreau The hidden costs of implementing and maintaining information systems , 2001 .

[24]  Sharon M. Ordoobadi,et al.  Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies: system-wide benefits value analysis , 2001 .

[25]  Jengchung V. Chen,et al.  Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[26]  Elwyn Graham John,et al.  Advanced manufacturing technology implementation: A review of benefits and a model for change , 2008 .

[27]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Theory of rejecting superior, new technologies , 1996 .