Contact finite element stress analysis of the hip joint

Two‐dimensional finite element analyses were conducted of the normal hip using contact elements at the joint surface. The models studied were constructed for a slice through the pubis, acetabulum, and ilium. In the analyses the proximal femur was pressed into the acetabulum and intraarticular pressures and principal stresses in the joint region were determined for different load magnitudes and directions and various boundary conditions. Three sets of boundary conditions were examined: (a) deformable pubic symphysis, (b) rigid pubic symphysis, and (c) simulations of experimental studies. In the deformable model the pubic symphysis was free to displace in the sagittal plane and rotate. In the rigid model the pubic symphysis was rigidly fixed. Superoposterior loading resulted in high‐contact pressures at the acetabular dome for all sets of boundary conditions. For the deformable model subject to a more medially directed load the acetabulum closed in such a manner as to squeeze the head of the femur creating high‐contact pressures superiorly and inferiorly. This resulted in significant compressive stresses in the superior dome cancellous bone and inferior cancellous bone. The cumulative effect of this squeezing action with normal biological remodeling may cause elongation of the femoral head resulting in asphericity and incongruity of the unloaded hip joint articular surfaces. Rigidly fixing the pubic symphysis stiffened the model and resulted in principal stress patterns that did not reflect trabecular density or orientations as well as those of the deformable pubic symphysis model. Finite element simulations of previous experimental studies modeled the close proximity of the fixation to the fixation to the excised acetablulum. These boundary conditions prevented the squeezing caused by pelvis deformations. The resulting contact areas, pressure distributions, and bone stresses were very different from those of more anatomic, deformable pubic symphysis model. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of hip contact pressures and stresses to imposed boundary conditions and indicate that care should be taken to simulate anatomic conditions in experimental and theoretical studies.

[1]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress distributions in the acetabular region--I. Before and after total joint replacement. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  N L Svensson,et al.  Stresses in the normal pelvis. , 1978, Computers in biology and medicine.

[3]  N L Svensson,et al.  Forces on the pelvis. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  A S Greenwald,et al.  The transmission of load through the human hip joint. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  H Oonishi,et al.  Mechanical analysis of the human pelvis and its application to the artificial hip joint--by means of the three dimensional finite element method. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  C. Armstrong,et al.  In vitro measurement of articular cartilage deformations in the intact human hip joint under load. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  S A Swanson,et al.  Contact pressures in the loaded human cadaver hip. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  T D Brown,et al.  In vitro contact stress distributions in the natural human hip. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  G E Kempson,et al.  Mechanical properties of articular cartilage. , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  T D Brown,et al.  A contact-coupled finite element analysis of the natural adult hip. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  P. D. Rushfeldt,et al.  Improved techniques for measuring in vitro the geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum--I. Ultrasonic measurement of acetabular surfaces, sphericity and cartilage thickness. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Incongruent Surfaces in the Human Hip Joint , 1968, Nature.

[15]  D R Pedersen,et al.  An axisymmetric model of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  A S Greenwald,et al.  Weight-bearing areas in the human hip joint. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  P. D. Rushfeldt,et al.  Improved techniques for measuring in vitro the geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum. II Instrumented endoprosthesis measurement of articular surface pressure distribution. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  R W Mann,et al.  Influence of cartilage geometry on the pressure distribution in the human hip joint. , 1979, Science.