Mode choice behavior of high school goers: Evaluating logistic regression and MLP neural networks

Abstract There is a quite a handful of scientific evidence where logistic regression and multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLPs) are compared to explain mode choice behavior. Student populations, however, are understudied. Further, a model that better explains the mode choice behavior of ‘high school’ goers has not been scientifically investigated. On this backdrop, this paper endeavored to make a comparison between the efficiency and robustness of the logistic regression model and MLPs to predict and explain the mode choice behavior of high school students in Khobar city. Among the pertinent variables considered, the logistic regression model finds that (i) monthly family income, (ii) travel time to school, and (iii) parents’ education level are statistically significant to determine the mode choice to the school. Based on the most significant variables and a comparative analysis conducted between logistic regression and MLP, the latter has better strength in predicting and explaining mode choice behavior of public high school goers. This led to a reflection on the implications for transport policies.

[1]  Anders Karlström,et al.  The influence of weather characteristics variability on individual’s travel mode choice in different seasons and regions in Sweden , 2015 .

[2]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Comparison of Neural and Conventional Approaches to Mode Choice Analysis , 2000 .

[3]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[4]  Mintesnot G. Woldeamanuel.  Younger teens' mode choice for school trips: Do parents' attitudes toward safety and traffic conditions along the school route matter? , 2016 .

[5]  Robert J. Marks,et al.  Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[6]  Stephen I. Gallant,et al.  Neural network learning and expert systems , 1993 .

[7]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[8]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice , 1997 .

[9]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Nested Logit Models and Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Household Automobile Choices: Comparison of Performance , 2002 .

[10]  Raúl Rojas,et al.  Neural Networks - A Systematic Introduction , 1996 .

[11]  Zhili Liu,et al.  School travel mode choice in Beijing, China , 2017 .

[12]  Sven Müller,et al.  Travel-to-school mode choice modelling and patterns of school choice in urban areas , 2008 .

[13]  Hsiao-Te Chang,et al.  Built Environment Effects on Children’s School Travel in Taipai: Independence and Travel Mode , 2010 .

[14]  D. Banister.  Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century , 2005 .

[15]  Adel S. Aldosary,et al.  A futuristic discourse of higher education system linkages with the labour markets in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia , 2010 .

[16]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Sample size in factor analysis. , 1999 .

[17]  Shin'ichi Tamura,et al.  Capabilities of a four-layered feedforward neural network: four layers versus three , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[18]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Investigating Subjective and Objective Factors Influencing Teenagers' School Travel Mode Choice: Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model , 2015 .

[19]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: an international comparison , 2003 .

[20]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Modelling inter-urban transport flows in Italy: A comparison between neural network analysis and logit analysis , 1996 .

[21]  Hasan M. Al-Ahmadi.  Development of Intercity Mode Choice Models for Saudi Arabia , 2006 .

[22]  Noreen C. McDonald,et al.  Children’s mode choice for the school trip: the role of distance and school location in walking to school , 2007 .

[23]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Determinants of transport mode choice: a comparison of Germany and the USA , 2011 .

[24]  John Pucher,et al.  Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: A comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies , 2006 .

[25]  M. Badri.  School travel modes: factors influencing parental choice in Abu Dhabi , 2013 .

[26]  Riza Atiq Abdullah O.K. Rahmat,et al.  Modeling of Transport Mode in Libya: a Binary Logit Model for Government Transportation Encouragement , 2011 .

[27]  Mark Braza,et al.  Neighborhood Design and Rates of Walking and Biking to Elementary School in 34 California Communities , 2004, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[28]  Bruce Appleyard,et al.  The Influence of crime on active & sustainable travel: New geo-statistical methods and theories for understanding crime and mode choice , 2017 .

[29]  Daniel Albalate,et al.  Factors explaining urban transport systems in large European cities: A cross-sectional approach , 2009 .

[30]  C. Black,et al.  Encouraging Walking: The Case of Journey-to-school Trips in Compact Urban Areas , 2001 .

[31]  G. Giuliano,et al.  Car ownership, travel and land use: a comparison of the US and Great Britain , 2006 .

[32]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making public transport financially sustainable , 2011 .

[33]  Guangjun Zhan,et al.  Using hierarchical tree-based regression model to examine university student travel frequency and mode choice patterns in China , 2016 .

[34]  P. Zhao,et al.  The determinants of commuting mode choice among school children in Beijing , 2015 .

[35]  A. Schäfer,et al.  The future mobility of the world population , 2000 .