Similarity determines the attentional blink.

When participants are required to respond to a target letter imbedded in a stream of rapid serially presented letters, perception of a 2nd target letter is impaired if the interval between the 2 targets is less than about 450 ms. This attentionally based posttarget suppression in visual processing, referred to as the attentional blink (AB), is not found when there is a brief pause in the stream immediately after the 1st target. To investigate the importance of posttarget stimulation in AB production, the categorical, featural, and spatial similarity of the immediate posttarget item to other items in the stream was manipulated. Although featural and spatial dissimilarity produced significant attenuation of the AB effect, categorical dissimilarity did not. Significant AB effects were found in all conditions, suggesting that the presentation of any patterned stimulus in close temporal proximity to the target provokes the AB.

[1]  D. LaBerge.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[3]  D E Broadbent,et al.  Spatial Factors in Visual Attention: Some Compensatory Effects of Location and Time of Arrival of Nontargets , 1987, Perception.

[4]  R. Jacobs.  Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery , 1979, Vision Research.

[5]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Karen M. Arnell,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[8]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[10]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? , 1994 .

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  N Kanwisher,et al.  Repetition blindness: The effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[13]  S W Keele,et al.  Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.