The relationship between three-dimensional principal rotations and mandibular deviation.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the rotational variations of three-dimensional (3D) trajectories at anatomic landmarks by different mandibular kinematics, we applied principal axes of inertia to the 3D trajectories. The principal rotations were determined directly from the anatomy-based trajectories produced by a patient-specific temporomandibular joint simulation. As a preliminary study, the principal rotations for a pilot group of patients with mandibular deviation were correlated with the deviation. STUDY DESIGN Three-dimensional mandibular movements from the patients with mandibular deviation were tracked based on a patient-specific splint and an optical tracking system. The dental occlusion recorded on the splint provided synchronization for initial movement in the tracking and the simulation phases. The translation and rotation recorded during tracking were applied sequentially to the mandibular model in relation to a fixed maxilla model. The sequential positions of the points of interest based on the reference coordinate system could also be simulated and traced by the same method. The landmarks selected for analysis were the points of the bilateral condyles and of the mandibular incisor. The moment of inertia tensor was calculated with respect to the 3D trajectory points. Using the unit vectors along the principal axes derived from the tensor matrix, α, β, and γ rotations (horizontal, sagittal, and frontal planes) around the z-, y-, and x-axes, respectively, were determined to represent the principal directions as principal rotations. RESULTS The measured rotations were correlated with the deviation in 3 orthogonal planes. Under the influence of the mandibular asymmetry, the orientations of the principal axis at the condyles increase counterclockwise in the horizontal plane and clockwise in the frontal plane. At the incisor point, the horizontal and frontal angles increase counterclockwise, but the sagittal angles increase clockwise. The interrelations between different rotations and between landmarks, defined as a correlation coefficient between principal rotations, decrease as the deviation increases. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional trajectories at selected landmarks based on the reference coordinate system were evaluated using principal axes of inertia to investigate the functional characteristics of the mandible with a deviation. The movement asymmetry between the condyles increases as the deviation increases in all directions. The principal rotations at the condyles can be explained by those at the incisor with varying degrees despite the deviation.

[1]  S. Palla,et al.  Condylar rotation and anterior translation in healthy human temporomandibular joints. , 1994, Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia.

[2]  T. Kawakami,et al.  Effect of Food Size on the Movement of the Mandibular First Molars and Condyles during Deliberate Unilateral Mastication in Humans , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[3]  S. Kohno,et al.  Mandibular movement and frontal craniofacial morphology in orthognathic surgery patients with mandibular deviation and protrusion. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[4]  B. Ingervall Variation of the range of movement of the mandible in relation to facial morphology in young adults. , 1971, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[5]  H Hayasaki,et al.  Associations between incisor and mandibular condylar movements during maximum mouth opening in humans. , 2000, Archives of oral biology.

[6]  S. Milam,et al.  Progressive mandibular retrusion-idiopathic condylar resorption. Part II. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Translation and rotation movements of the mandible during mouth opening and closing , 2009, Clinical anatomy.

[8]  Jaan Kiusalaas,et al.  Engineering mechanics, Dynamics , 1996 .

[9]  S. Miyawaki,et al.  Condylar Motion in Patients with Reduced Anterior Disc Displacement , 2001, Journal of dental research.

[10]  T. Deguchi,et al.  Relationship between sagittal condylar path and the degree of mandibular asymmetry in unilateral cross-bite patients. , 1994, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[11]  Guozhong Dai,et al.  A New Virtual Dynamic Dentomaxillofacial System for Analyzing Mandibular Movement, Occlusal Contact, and TMJ Condition , 2007, HCI.

[12]  M Miyakawa,et al.  A computerized system for analyzing occlusal relations during mandibular movements. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[13]  Ulrich Neumann,et al.  The virtual craniofacial patient: 3D jaw modeling and animation. , 2003, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[14]  W. Bell,et al.  Hypomobility after maxillary and mandibular osteotomies. , 1984, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[15]  Y. Yamasaki,et al.  Occlusal Contacts during lateral Excursions in Children with Primary Dentition , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[16]  Y. Kuwahara,et al.  Correlation between facial morphology, mouth opening ability, and condylar movement during opening-closing jaw movements in female adults with normal occlusion. , 2002, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  S. Miyawaki,et al.  Correlation between craniofacial and condylar path asymmetry. , 2008, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[18]  D. Sinn,et al.  Recovery of mandibular mobility following orthognathic surgery. , 1991, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[19]  Masahiko Tsuruta,et al.  Development of a new analyzing system for stomatognathic functions , 1996 .

[20]  L. Wolford,et al.  Changes in temporomandibular joint dysfunction after orthognathic surgery. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[21]  P. Pirttiniemi,et al.  Relationship between craniofacial and condyle path asymmetry in unilateral cross-bite patients. , 1990, European journal of orthodontics.

[22]  D. Kubein-Meesenburg,et al.  Changes in mandibular mobility after different procedures of orthognathic surgery. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.

[23]  A. Michelotti,et al.  The relationship between vertical craniofacial morphology and the sagittal path of mandibular movements. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[24]  M. Dolwick,et al.  The effects of orthognathic surgery on mandibular range of motion. , 1985, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[25]  M. Naeije,et al.  Relationship between condylar and incisor point displacement during habitual maximum open-close movements. , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[26]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  Sex differences in mandibular movements during opening and closing. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[27]  M Naeije,et al.  Local kinematic and anthropometric factors related to the maximum mouth opening in healthy individuals. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[28]  G. Stacy Recovery of oral opening following sagittal ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. , 1987, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.