Comparison of line-wise pl-imaging and area-wise pl-imaging

Abstract In this contribution we compare the results of a line-scanning camera and line-wise illumination based PL-imaging system (Line-PLI) to the results of a “classic” PL-imaging system featuring a matrix camera and a full area illumination of the wafer. We investigate the impact of the different injection conditions which result from the significantly higher irradiance user in the Line-PLI system. We derive a formula which can easily be used to predict how high the irradiance may be without causing the lifetime to be limited by intrinsic silicon recombination. We compare the image contrasts caused by regions of different recombination activity and we compare the robustness of the method, which calibrates the PL-images to local effective lifetime using photoconductance (QSSPC) measurements. As a result it can be said that contrasts between regions of high and low recombination activity are more pronounced using the investigated Line-PLI setup, which qualifies it excellently for the visualization of process inhomogeneities causing defects on solar cell precursor. We calculate that the irradiance of the investigated setup is still low enough to differentiate between regions of different Shockley-Read-Hall recombination if the effective sample lifetimes are roughly below 250 µs. Moreover we derive an uncertainty of 24 % on the absolute values of effective lifetime using the Area-PLI setup while we derive an uncertainty of only 8 % on the absolute values of effective lifetime using the Line-PLI setup for the investigated samples.

[1]  Thorsten Trupke,et al.  Spatially resolved series resistance of silicon solar cells obtained from luminescence imaging , 2007 .

[2]  Carsten Schinke,et al.  Experimental setup for camera-based measurements of electrically and optically stimulated luminescence of silicon solar cells and wafers. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[3]  O. Breitenstein,et al.  Short-Circuit Current Density Imaging Via PL Image Evaluation Based on Implied Voltage Distribution , 2015, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[4]  Eicke R. Weber,et al.  Quality control of as-cut multicrystalline silicon wafers using photoluminescence imaging for solar cell production , 2010 .

[5]  T. Trupke,et al.  Bulk minority carrier lifetimes and doping of silicon bricks from photoluminescence intensity ratios , 2011 .

[6]  G. Hahn,et al.  Minority charge carrier lifetime mapping of crystalline silicon wafers by time-resolved photoluminescence imaging , 2011 .

[7]  M. Schubert,et al.  Photoluminescence imaging of silicon wafers , 2006 .

[8]  Thorsten Trupke,et al.  Application of photoluminescence characterization to the development and manufacturing of high-efficiency silicon solar cells , 2006 .

[9]  Ralf Preu,et al.  Evaluating luminescence based voltage images of silicon solar cells , 2010 .

[10]  Spatially resolved characterization of silicon as‐cut wafers with photoluminescence imaging , 2009 .

[11]  Wilhelm Warta,et al.  Luminescence imaging for the detection of shunts on silicon solar cells , 2008 .

[12]  Thomas Brox,et al.  Inline quality rating of multi‐crystalline wafers based on photoluminescence images , 2016 .

[13]  M. Schubert,et al.  Minority carrier lifetime in silicon wafers from quasi-steady-state photoluminescence , 2010 .

[14]  R. Sinton,et al.  Photoluminescence Imaging on Silicon Bricks , 2009 .

[15]  Quantitative carrier lifetime images optically measured on rough silicon wafers , 2007 .

[16]  K. Bothe,et al.  Photoconductance‐calibrated photoluminescence lifetime imaging of crystalline silicon , 2008 .

[17]  E. Franklin,et al.  Contrast enhancement of luminescence images via point-spread deconvolution , 2012, 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[18]  Photoluminescence Imaging Using Silicon Line-Scanning Cameras , 2016, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.