Balancing Fairness and Efficiency: Performance Evaluation with Disadvantaged Units in Non-homogeneous Environments

Abstract Balancing fairness and efficiency has become an emerging issue in today's society. In this paper we propose a balanced benchmarking methodology to address the fairness issue in performance evaluation. The methodology used to create performance measures is data envelopment analysis (DEA), a tool designed to evaluate the relative efficiencies of comparable decision-making units (DMUs); i.e. all DMUs use the same inputs and outputs and experience the same general operating conditions. In many applications, however, the DMUs may experience non-homogenous operating conditions or environments. An example might be a set of manufacturing plants where some have been upgraded and others not. Such settings can necessitate modifying the DEA structure such as to make allowance for different environmental conditions. Such a model is developed herein to create a level playing field for performance evaluation in two different settings: a setting involving hybrid and conventional (non-hybrid) vehicles; and another setting involving bank branches located in poverty and non-poverty regions. Our model and empirical tests contribute not only to the advance of balanced benchmarking methodologies, but also to the practice of incorporating fairness in performance evaluation across multiple products and organizations.

[1]  Tina Fawcett,et al.  Carbon Rationing and Personal Energy Use , 2004 .

[2]  Alper Ertürk,et al.  Employees’ Need for Independence, Organizational Commitment, and Turnover Intentions: The Moderating Role of Justice Perceptions About Performance Appraisals , 2016 .

[3]  Wenbin Liu,et al.  Preference, Production and Performance in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  Stephan Kramer,et al.  Fairness perceptions of annual bonus payments: The effects of subjective performance measures and the achievement of bonus targets , 2016 .

[5]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach , 2007 .

[6]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Understanding Car-Buying Behavior: Psychological Determinants of Energy Efficiency and Practical Implications , 2015 .

[7]  L. Seiford,et al.  Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—Measuring attractiveness and progress , 2003 .

[8]  Frank R. Field,et al.  A practical road to lightweight cars , 1997 .

[9]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Sergeja Slapničar,et al.  The perceived fairness of performance evaluation: The role of uncertainty , 2012 .

[12]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance: Modeling Considerations and Approaches , 2004 .

[13]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[14]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  Brian W. Jacobs,et al.  Operational Productivity, Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance, and Risk in Manufacturing Firms , 2016 .

[16]  R. T. Zarinkamar,et al.  Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[17]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Measuring Corporate Social Performance: An Efficiency Perspective , 2010 .

[18]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Green Product Design With Engineering Tradeoffs Under Technology Efficient Frontiers: Analytical Results and Empirical Tests , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[20]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Improving Pupil Transportation in North Carolina , 1994 .

[21]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[22]  John S. Liu,et al.  Research fronts in data envelopment analysis , 2016 .

[23]  Hung-pin Lai,et al.  Estimation of the production profile and metafrontier technology gap: a quantile approach , 2018, Empirical Economics.

[24]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[25]  Hamid Noori,et al.  A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Measuring Eco-Inefficiency: A New Frontier Approach , 2011, Oper. Res..

[27]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[28]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Production Frontier Methodologies and Efficiency as a Performance Measure in Strategic Management Research , 2013 .

[29]  George E. Battese,et al.  Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function , 2002 .