INTEROP deliverable DTG 6.2 : Method repository

This deliverable presents the INTEROP method chunks repository (MCR), its architecture and provided services. It includes the definition of a reusable method chunk, its structure, illustrated with examples of method chunks stored in the repository and guidelines for method chunks definition and characterisation covering tasks TG6.2 and TG6.3 of the work plan of the task group. The main result is the definition of the structure of the method chunk repository emphasizing the link to interoperability. Interoperability is a first-class concept in the structure of the method chunk repository. It not only characterizes method chunks, i.e. procedures to solve interoperability problems, but also interoperability cases, i.e. the presentation of actual problems involving interoperability issues. TG 6 has produced three MCR prototypes. Two experiments were undertaken using the Metis system and one using ConceptBase. The task group attended a two-day intense workshop on Metis. As a result, two experiments with Metis as platform for the method chunk repository are under way and reported in this deliverable. One is realizing the structure of the MCR as specified in this report. The other is an alternative approach that serves as a benchmark and is reported in the appendix. The ConceptBase prototype utilizes the metamodel presented in this deliverable. We have analysed three cases involving various aspects of interoperability. One case is about establishing a broker platform for insurance agents, the second about linking the information systems in the public utility sector, and the third case is establishing the relation of the ATHENA Model-Driven Interoperability Framework to the goals of the MCR. The results of the TG6 have been published at the ISD conference 2006 and the ER conference 2006. Copies of the papers are included in the appendix. The report of the example session with the method chunk repository has been shifted towards deliverable TG6.3 (Tutorial of the MCR). This is the more logical place. We want to emphasize that TG6 was not only busy in drafting concepts, exploring the state of the art, and analyzing cases. We are actually experimenting with a prototype and consider this a valuable contribution to the network. As soon as the prototype is stable, knowledge about interoperability solutions can be coded in this repository and can guide designers of interoperable systems by experience knowledge.

[1]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[2]  Per Backlund,et al.  Method Chunks for Interoperability , 2006, ER.

[3]  John L. Dettbarn,et al.  Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. , 2004 .

[4]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for Information Systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  David Chen,et al.  Practices, principles and patterns for interoperability. , 2005 .

[6]  Jan Goossenaerts Monitoring, Evaluation & Decision Interoperability in Networked Organisations , 2006, EMOI-INTEROP.

[7]  Isabelle Mirbel,et al.  Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[8]  A. F. Harmsen,et al.  Situational Method Engineering , 1997 .

[9]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[10]  Robert W. Fogel,et al.  Notes on the Social Saving Controversy , 1979, The Journal of Economic History.

[11]  Colette Rolland,et al.  An Approach for Method Reengineering , 2001, ER.

[12]  R. Rist,et al.  Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System: A Handbook for Development Practitioners , 2004 .

[13]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[14]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Assembly Techniques for Method Engineering , 1998, CAiSE.

[15]  David M. Booth,et al.  Web Services Architecture , 2004 .

[16]  Manfred A. Jeusfeld,et al.  An Interoperability Classification Framework for Method Chunk Repositories , 2007 .

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .