A case of impaired shape integration: Implications for models of visual object processing

We describe a patient, HE, who was left with a remarkably selective deficit in intermediate vision following an infarct in the right occipito-temporal region. Thus, HE was able to group elements by colour and proximity but impaired in grouping based on similarity in shape. This finding supports the notion that grouping may be divided into two general steps: (i) element clustering and (ii) shape configuration, with the latter operation being impaired in HE. As opposed to previous cases with shape integration deficits, HE was able to name objects accurately. Initially, this might suggest that shape integration is not a prerequisite for normal object naming. However, on more demanding tests of visual object recognition, HE's performance deteriorated, with her performance being inversely related to the demand placed on integration of local elements into more elaborate shape descriptions. From this we conclude that shape integration is important for normal object recognition.

[1]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Object identification in simultanagnosia: When wholes are not the sum of their parts , 2004, Cognitive Neuropsychology.

[2]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  John Duncan,et al.  Attentional Functions in Dorsal and Ventral Simultanagnosia , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[4]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[5]  O. Paulson,et al.  Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Memories are made of this: the effects of time on stored visual knowledge in a case of visual agnosia. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[8]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual organization in vision : behavioral and neural perspectives , 2003 .

[9]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Jon Driver,et al.  Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search , 1998 .

[11]  G. Sperling.  A Model for Visual Memory Tasks1 , 1963, Human factors.

[12]  E. Marg.  A VISION OF THE BRAIN , 1994 .

[13]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  M Behrmann,et al.  Intact visual imagery and impaired visual perception in a patient with visual agnosia. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J Sergent,et al.  Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  E K Warrington,et al.  Selective impairment of memory and visual perception in splenial tumours. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual feature discrimination in simultanagnosia: A study of two cases , 1994 .

[18]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  C Bundesen,et al.  Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  C. Butter,et al.  Integrative Agnosia Following Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy , 1994, Cortex.

[21]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  A deficit of intermediate vision: Experimental observations and theoretical implications , 1999 .

[22]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Visual Perceptual Organization: Lessons From lesions , 2003 .

[24]  S. Zeki,et al.  Brain Activity Related to the Perception of Illusory Contours , 1996, NeuroImage.

[25]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  Visual Apperceptive Agnosia: A Clinico-Anatomical Study of Three Cases , 1988, Cortex.

[26]  Christian Gerlach,et al.  Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[28]  E. Warrington,et al.  Two Categorical Stages of Object Recognition , 1978, Perception.

[29]  F. Kitterle,et al.  Symmetries and asymmetries in the processing of sinusoidal gratings , 1991 .

[30]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Uniform connectedness and classical gestalt principles of perceptual grouping , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  V. Bruce,et al.  Visual Cognition: Computational, Experimental, and Neuropsychological Perspectives , 1989 .

[32]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[33]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The computation of occluded contours in visual agnosia: Evidence for early computation prior to shape binding and figure-ground coding , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[34]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[35]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  A. Gade,et al.  Visuel closure—Street completion test , 1988 .

[37]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  I. T. Draper.  THE ASSESSMENT OF APHASIA AND RELATED DISORDERS , 1973 .

[39]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[40]  F. Drislane,et al.  A historic case of visual agnosia revisited after 40 years. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  G Humphreys,et al.  Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Philip J. Kellman.  Visual Perception of Objects and Boundaries: A Four-Dimensional Approach , 2003 .

[43]  M. Farah.  Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision , 1990 .

[44]  E. Warrington,et al.  The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  R. Kimchi.  Visual Perceptual Organization: A Microgenetic Analysis , 2003 .

[46]  G. Denes,et al.  Multiple-domain dissociation between impaired visual perception and preserved mental imagery in a patient with bilateral extrastriate lesions , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  BORB: Birmingham Object Recognition Battery , 2017 .

[48]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions , 1984 .

[50]  R. Kimchi,et al.  What does visual agnosia tell us about perceptual organization and its relationship to object perception? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  C. Gerlacha,et al.  Brain activity related to integrative processes in visual object recognition : bottom-up integration and the modulatory influence of stored knowledge , 2002 .

[52]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Patient assessment based on a theory of visual attention (TVA): subtle deficits after a right frontal-subcortical lesion , 2003, Neuropsychologia.