Preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry

In this article, we describe the results of a study of the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of preservice chemistry teachers in the context of a postgraduate teacher education program. A group of preservice teachers (n = 12) took part in an experimental introductory course module about the use of particle models to help secondary school students understand the relationship between phenomena (e.g., properties of substances, physical and chemical processes) and corpuscular entities (e.g., atoms, molecules, ions). The module emphasized learning from teaching by connecting authentic teaching experiences with institutional workshops. Research data were obtained from answers to written assignments, transcripts of workshop discussions, and reflective lesson reports, written by the participants. The outcomes of the study revealed that, initially, all participants were able to describe specific learning difficulties, such as problems secondary school students have in relating the properties of substances to characteristics of the constituent particles. Also, at this stage, all preservice teachers acknowledged the potential importance of using models of molecules and atoms to promote secondary school students' understanding of the relationship between phenomena and corpuscular entities. After teaching, all preservice teachers demonstrated a deeper understanding of their students' problems with the use of particle models. In addition, about half of the participants had become more aware of the possibilities and limitations of using particle models in specific teaching situations. Through learning from teaching, the preservice teachers further developed their PCK of using particle models, although this development varied among preservice teachers studied. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 42: 947–964, 2005

[1]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Rethinking Methods in Psychology , 1995 .

[2]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future , 1999 .

[3]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry , 1996 .

[4]  Adri H. Verdonk,et al.  The particulate nature of matter in science education and in science , 1996 .

[5]  Kathryn F. Cochran,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation , 1993 .

[6]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis , 1995 .

[7]  J. Gilbert Chemical education: towards research-based practice , 2003 .

[8]  Hilary Hollingsworth,et al.  Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth , 2002 .

[9]  Margarete Kedzior,et al.  Teacher Professional Development , 2004 .

[10]  Robert E. Yager,et al.  The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science , 1983 .

[11]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Science teachers' diagnosis and understanding of students' preconceptions , 2003 .

[12]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Models and Modelling in Chemical Education , 2002 .

[13]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN LEARNING TO TEACH ELEMENTARY SCIENCE , 1999 .

[14]  Vj. Janesick The choreography of qualitative research design , 2000 .

[15]  Pamela Joy Mulhall,et al.  Documenting Science Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge Through PaP-eRs , 2001 .

[16]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2002 .

[17]  Eric Francoeur,et al.  The Forgotten Tool: The Design and Use of Molecular Models , 1997 .

[18]  J. H. van Driel,et al.  The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ PCK , 2002 .

[19]  B. Andersson Pupils' Conceptions of Matter and its Transformations (age 12-16) , 1990 .

[20]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy , 1994 .

[21]  R. Marks Pedagogical Content Knowledge: From a Mathematical Case to a Modified Conception , 1990 .

[22]  Adri H. Verdonk,et al.  A New Road to Reactions Part 4. The Substance and Its Molecules. , 1987 .

[23]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching , 1999 .

[24]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level , 1991 .

[25]  J. Krajcik,et al.  The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators† , 1993 .

[26]  P. Mulhall,et al.  In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice , 2004 .

[27]  M. Osborne Teacher as knower and learner: Reflections on situated knowledge in science teaching , 1998 .

[28]  Hilda Borko,et al.  Secondary science teachers' knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification , 1993 .

[29]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Teaching, Multimedia, and Mathematics: Investigations of Real Practice , 2000 .

[30]  J. H. Driel,et al.  Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge , 1998 .

[31]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Assessment and Measurement of Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 1999 .

[32]  P. Grossman The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education , 1990 .

[33]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[34]  Richard M. Thomas,et al.  The pictographic molecular paradigm , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[35]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[36]  Onno De Jong,et al.  The Development of Preservice Chemistry Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2002 .

[37]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Philosophy of Chemistry: An Emerging Field with Implications for Chemistry Education , 2001 .

[38]  Deborah C. Smith,et al.  The Construction of Subject Matter Knowledge in Primary Science Teaching. , 1989 .