Routine quality control recommendations for nuclear medicine instrumentation

Keywords Qualitycontrol.Qualityassurance.Nuclearmedicineinstrumentation.Gammacamera.SPECT.PET.CT.Radionuclidecalibrator.Thyroiduptakeprobe.Nonimagingintraoperativeprobe.Gammacountingsystem.Radiationmonitors.PreclinicalPETIntroductionThese recommendations cover routine quality control (QC)of instrumentation used within a nuclear medicine depart-ment. Routine QC testing starts after installation of theinstrument, and after acceptance testing, and continues on aregular basis throughout its lifetime. Additional periodictests may be carried out to provide more in-depth testing.Recommendations for acceptance testing are covered in aseparate document. These recommendations must be con-sideredinthelightofanynationalguidelinesandlegislation,which must be followed. The recommendations cover thetypes of tests to be performed, and suggested frequencies,but they do not specify the protocols to be followed, whichare available from other reference sources quoted.Acceptance and reference testsAfter installation, and before it is put into clinical use, anuclear medicine instrument must undergo thorough andcareful acceptance testing, the aim being to verify that theinstrument performs according to its specifications and itsclinical purpose. Each instrument is supplied with a set ofbasic specifications. These have been produced by themanufacturer according to standard test procedures, whichshould be traceable to standard protocols, such as theNEMA and IEC performance standards [1–4, 11, 17, 30,37]. By following such standard protocols in the clinicalsetting, with support from the vendor for supplyingphantoms and software where necessary, specificationscan be verified and baseline performance data created.Additional tests are usually also needed in order to more

[1]  J. Colsher,et al.  Recommendations for implementing SPECT instrumentation quality control. Nuclear Medicine Section--National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). , 1999, European journal of nuclear medicine.

[2]  G Bibbo,et al.  Physics in Nuclear Medicine, 3rd edition , 2005 .

[3]  T D Cradduck,et al.  National electrical manufacturers association , 1983, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[4]  Frederic H Fahey,et al.  Data acquisition in PET imaging. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[5]  R. Lindstrom Quality control in diagnostic radiology. , 1978, Dimensions in health service.

[6]  J. Aarsvold,et al.  Intraoperative probes. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[7]  T G Turkington,et al.  Introduction to PET instrumentation. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[8]  G. V. von Schulthess Positron emission tomography versus positron emission tomography/computed tomography: from "unclear" to "new-clear" medicine. , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Michael E Casey,et al.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Helmar Bergmann,et al.  An inter-laboratory comparison study of image quality of PET scanners using the NEMA NU 2-2001 procedure for assessment of image quality , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  S. Muller,et al.  Evaluation of surgical gamma probes for radioguided sentinel node localisation , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Norlin T. Winkler,et al.  Quality Control In Diagnostic Radiology , 1976, Other Conferences.

[13]  A. Perkins,et al.  Specification and performance of intra-operative gamma probes for sentinel node detection. , 1999, Nuclear medicine communications.

[14]  A. Britten,et al.  A method to evaluate intra-operative gamma probes for sentinel lymph node localisation , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Pat Zanzonico,et al.  Routine Quality Control of Clinical Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation: A Brief Review* , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  H. Bergmann,et al.  Multiple window spatial registration error of a gamma camera: 133Ba point source as a replacement of the NEMA procedure , 2008, BMC medical physics.

[17]  S. Cherry,et al.  Physics in Nuclear Medicine , 2004 .

[18]  S. Heller,et al.  The intraoperative gamma probe: basic principles and choices available. , 2000, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[19]  Raymond P. Rossi,et al.  Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners , 1993 .

[20]  Horace Hines,et al.  Recommendations for implementing SPECT instrumentation quality control , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  H. S. Osborne,et al.  The international electrotechnical commission , 1953, Electrical Engineering.

[22]  E. Pauwels,et al.  Aspects of performance assessment of whole body imaging systems , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  M J Woods,et al.  Protocol for establishing and maintaining the calibration of medical radionuclide calibrators and their quality control. , 2006 .

[24]  J. Choe,et al.  SU‐FF‐I‐79: Development of The Practical Guidelines of PET‐CT Quality Control , 2009 .

[25]  E. Busemann-Sokole Measurement of collimator hole angulation and camera head tilt for slant and parallel hole collimators used in SPECT. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.