Public variant databases: liability?

Public variant databases support the curation, clinical interpretation, and sharing of genomic data, thus reducing harmful errors or delays in diagnosis. As variant databases are increasingly relied on in the clinical context, there is concern that negligent variant interpretation will harm patients and attract liability. This article explores the evolving legal duties of laboratories, public variant databases, and physicians in clinical genomics and recommends a governance framework for databases to promote responsible data sharing.Genet Med advance online publication 15 December 2016

[1]  Sue Povey,et al.  Practical guidelines addressing ethical issues pertaining to the curation of human locus-specific variation databases (LSDBs) , 2010 .

[2]  Quality standards for DNA sequence variation databases to improve clinical management under development in Australia , 2014, Applied & translational genomics.

[3]  Mauno Vihinen,et al.  Capturing all disease-causing mutations for clinical and research use: Toward an effortless system for the Human Variome Project , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  Matthew S. Lebo,et al.  Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. , 2016, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  Brian H Shirts,et al.  Changing interpretations, stable genes: responsibilities of patients, professionals, and policy makers in the clinical interpretation of complex genetic information , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[6]  D. Solís.  US Food and Drug Administration , 2010 .

[7]  J. Winn.  Consumer protection in the age of the 'information economy' , 2006 .

[8]  H. Firth,et al.  Practical guidelines addressing ethical issues pertaining to the curation of human locus-specific variation databases (LSDBs) , 2010, Human mutation.

[9]  B. Hurwitz,et al.  Legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR GENOMICS AND HEALTH , 2015 .

[11]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Ethical guideposts for allelic variation databases , 2000, Human mutation.

[12]  John-Paul Plazzer,et al.  DNA variant databases: current state and future directions. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[13]  W. Grody,et al.  ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions 2007 , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  Rachel G Liao,et al.  A federated ecosystem for sharing genomic, clinical data , 2016, Science.

[15]  C. Sallée,et al.  Locus‐specific databases: from ethical principles to practice , 2005, Human mutation.

[16]  Euan A Ashley,et al.  Clinical interpretation and implications of whole-genome sequencing. , 2014, JAMA.

[17]  Bale,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[18]  Leslie G Biesecker,et al.  Databases of genomic variation and phenotypes: existing resources and future needs. , 2013, Human molecular genetics.

[19]  G. Marchant,et al.  Personalized medicine and genetic malpractice , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[20]  I. Scheffer,et al.  The spectrum of SCN1A-related infantile epileptic encephalopathies. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Peter N. Robinson,et al.  Human genotype–phenotype databases: aims, challenges and opportunities , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.