The Creative Class and Regional Growth - Towards a knowledge based Approach. Paper

Research in regional growth has been characterised by two trends in recent years. The first is that creativity and talents are seen as parameters for regional growth. The creative class approach has argued that competition for talents has increased as innovation becomes crucial for maintaining competitiveness. This has forced local and regional authorities to implement new political actions toward supplementing the traditional business orientated policies with policies orientated towards attracting and retaining people. The second trend argues that regional analysis and policy-making need to be disaggregated to meet the diverse needs of different regions and due to the particularities characterizing innovative industries drawing on different knowledge bases. This paper argues that combining the understanding of knowledge on a disaggregated level that characterizes the knowledge base approach and the perspective on talent that the creative class approach represents provide a promising framework for regional analysis.

[1]  Anders Malmberg,et al.  Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration , 1997 .

[2]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  The weakness of strong ties: Collective action failure in a highly cohesive group* , 1996 .

[3]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[4]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Competitiveness of Firms and Regions , 1999 .

[5]  G. Norcliffe,et al.  New Geographies of Comic Book Production in North America: The New Artisan, Distancing, and the Periodic Social Economy , 2003 .

[6]  B. Asheim,et al.  Talents and Innovative Regions: exploring the Importance of Face-to-Face Communication and Buzz , 2005 .

[7]  J. Jacobs.  Cities and the wealth of nations , 1984 .

[8]  A Bayat,et al.  Cities: Reimagining the Urban , 2003 .

[9]  R. Florida.  Cities and the Creative Class , 2003 .

[10]  Antonio G. Calafati.  On Industrial Districts , 2000 .

[11]  R. Atkinson.  The Flight of the Creative Class , 2006 .

[12]  R. Florida,et al.  America's looming creativity crisis , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Book Review , 2001 .

[14]  M. Arthur,et al.  Paradox in Project-Based Enterprise: The Case of Film Making , 1998 .

[15]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[16]  David A. Wolfe,et al.  SPACES OF KNOWLEDGE FLOWS: CLUSTERS IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT , 2005 .

[17]  A. Pratt.  The Cultural Economy , 2004, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography.

[18]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[19]  Gernot Grabher.  Temporary Architectures of Learning: Knowledge Governance in Project Ecologies , 2004 .

[20]  D. Harvey.  From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism , 1989 .

[21]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation System Policy: a Knowledge-based Approach , 2005 .

[22]  A. Scott,et al.  Regions, Globalization, Development , 2003 .

[23]  D. Massey.  Space, Place, and Gender , 1994 .

[24]  A. Scott.  The Cultural Economy of Cities , 1997 .

[25]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[26]  Richard Florida,et al.  Competing on Creativity: Placing Ontario's Cities in North American Context , 2002 .

[27]  Gernot Grabher,et al.  The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, Talents and Teams , 2002 .

[28]  R. Florida.  The Economic Geography of Talent , 2002 .

[29]  A. Amin.  Regions unbound: towards a new politics of place , 2004 .

[30]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[31]  Richard Florida,et al.  Technology and Tolerance: Diversity and High-Tech Growth , 2002 .