Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for colorectal cancer in a population-based cohort.

PURPOSE Randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival for patients with stage III colon cancer and that chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy improves survival for patients with stage II or III rectal cancer. This population-based study was designed to assess use of these treatments in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS From the California Cancer Registry, we identified all patients diagnosed during 1996 to 1997 with stage III colon cancer (n = 1,422) and stage II or III rectal cancer (n = 534) in 22 northern California counties. To supplement registry data on adjuvant therapies and ascertain reasons they were not used, we surveyed physicians or reviewed office records for 1,449 patients (74%). RESULTS Chemotherapy rates varied widely by age from 88% (age < 55 years) to 11% (age >or= 85 years), and radiation therapy varied similarly. Adjusting for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics, chemotherapy was used less often among older and unmarried patients, and radiation therapy was used less often among older patients, black patients, and those initially treated in low-volume hospitals. Adjusted rates of chemotherapy varied significantly (P <.01) among individual hospitals: 79% and 51%, respectively, at one SD above and below average (67%). Physicians' reasons for not providing adjuvant therapy included patient refusal (30% for chemotherapy, 22% for radiation therapy), comorbid illness (22% and 14%, respectively), or lack of clinical indication (22% and 45%, respectively). CONCLUSION Use of adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer varies substantially by age, race, marital status, hospital volume, and individual hospital, indicating opportunities to improve care. With enhanced data on adjuvant therapies, population-based registries could become a valuable resource for monitoring the quality of cancer care.

[1]  C. Lynch,et al.  Age, sex, and racial differences in the use of standard adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Cress,et al.  Use of Surgical Procedures and Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Population-Based Study , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[3]  H. Muss Older age--not a barrier to cancer treatment. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Labianca,et al.  A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  C. Begg,et al.  Who gets adjuvant treatment for stage II and III rectal cancer? Insight from surveillance, epidemiology, and end results--Medicare. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  C. Begg,et al.  Age and adjuvant chemotherapy use after surgery for stage III colon cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Chemotherapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  C. Begg,et al.  Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. , 2000, JAMA.

[10]  J. Krischer,et al.  Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[11]  Joseph V. Simone,et al.  Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Cancer Care , 2000 .

[12]  M. Chassin,et al.  Determining the Quality of Breast Cancer Care: Do Tumor Registries Measure Up? , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  K C Stange,et al.  Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment. , 2000, Medical care.

[14]  J. Davis,et al.  Stage III colon cancers: why adjuvant chemotherapy is not offered to elderly patients. , 2000, Archives of surgery.

[15]  D. Stockton,et al.  Multiple cancer site comparison of adjusted survival by hospital of treatment: an East Anglian study , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  J. Mandelblatt,et al.  Equitable access to cancer services , 1999, Cancer.

[17]  N. Christakis,et al.  The performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in Medicare claims. , 1999, Medical care.

[18]  A. Norman,et al.  Adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in patients 70 years or older. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. Goodwin,et al.  Information on radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer: the advantages of the linked medicare and SEER data. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  J. Schafer Multiple imputation: a primer , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[21]  A. Stewart,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base report on patterns of care for adenocarcinoma of the rectum, 1985‐1995 , 1998, Cancer.

[22]  R. Havlik,et al.  Comorbidity and age as predictors of risk for early mortality of male and female colon carcinoma patients , 1998, Cancer.

[23]  D. Winchester,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base report on colon cancer , 1996, Cancer.

[24]  V. Pricolo,et al.  Factors affecting prognosis and management of carcinoma of the colon and rectum in patients more than eighty years of age. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[25]  Marco Lorenzi,et al.  Folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer. , 1994, Gastroenterology.

[26]  P. Newcomb,et al.  Cancer treatment and age: patient perspectives. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  L. Kessler,et al.  Potential for Cancer Related Health Services Research Using a Linked Medicare‐Tumor Registry Database , 1993, Medical care.

[28]  J. Samet,et al.  Determinants of cancer therapy in elderly patients , 1993 .

[29]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  N. Krieger Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[31]  W. Meyers,et al.  Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  E. Guadagnoli,et al.  The influence of patient age on the diagnosis and treatment of lung and colorectal cancer. , 1990, Archives of internal medicine.

[33]  T R Fleming,et al.  Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  T. Fleming,et al.  Surgical adjuvant therapy of large-bowel carcinoma: an evaluation of levamisole and the combination of levamisole and fluorouracil. The North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  D. Rubin Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys , 1989 .

[36]  C G Chute,et al.  Social and economic factors in the choice of lung cancer treatment. A population-based study in two rural states. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  D. Stablein,et al.  Survival after postoperative combination treatment of rectal cancer. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  Taylor Murray,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2001 , 2001, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[39]  H. Wieand,et al.  Controlled trial of fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colon cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  J. Faivre,et al.  Colon cancer in the elderly: evidence for major improvements in health care and survival. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[41]  G. Launoy,et al.  [Contribution of cancer registries to the evaluation of cancer treatment: on the example of rectal cancer]. , 1996, Annales de Chirurgie.

[42]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.