Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching

A considerable amount of literature on peer coaching suggests that the professional development of teachers can be improved through experimentation, observation, reflection, the exchange of professional ideas, and shared problem‐solving. Reciprocal peer coaching provides teachers with an opportunity to engage in such activities in an integrated form. Even though empirical evidence shows effects of peer coaching and teacher satisfaction about coaching, the actual individual professional development processes have not been studied extensively. This article offers a way to analyse and categorize the learning processes of teachers who take part in a reciprocal peer coaching trajectory by using the Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth as an analytical tool. Learning is understood as a change in the teacher’s cognition and/or behaviour. The assumption underlying the Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth is that change occurs in four distinct domains that encompass the teacher’s professional world: the personal domain, the domain of practice, the domain of consequence and the external domain. Change in one domain does not always lead to change in another, but when changes over domains do occur, different change patterns can be described. Repeated multiple data collection methods were used to obtain a rich description of patterns of change of four experienced secondary school teachers. The data sources were: audiotapes of coaching conferences, audiotapes of semi‐structured learning interviews by telephone, and digital diaries with teacher reports of learning experiences. Qualitative analysis of the three data sources resulted in two different types of patterns: including the external domain and not including the external domain. Patterns of change within a context of reciprocal peer coaching do not necessarily have to include reciprocal peer coaching activities. When, however, patterns do include the external reciprocal peer coaching domain, this is often part of a change process in which reactive activities in the domains of practice and consequence are involved as well. These patterns often demonstrate more complex processes of change.

[1]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[2]  Henny P. A. Boshuizen,et al.  Self-regulation in Higher Education Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[3]  T. Guskey Staff Development and the Process of Teacher Change , 1986 .

[4]  Rosária Justi,et al.  The use of the Interconnected Model of Teacher Professional Growth for understanding the development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling , 2006 .

[5]  F. Oser,et al.  Competence oriented teacher training : old research demands and new pathways , 2006 .

[6]  Hilary Hollingsworth,et al.  Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth , 2002 .

[7]  Gary D. Fenstermacher The Knower and the Known: The Nature of Knowledge in Research on Teaching , 1994 .

[8]  T. Wubbels Taking account of student teachers' preconceptions , 1992 .

[9]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[10]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[11]  C. Desforges,et al.  How does experience affect theoretical knowledge for teaching , 1995 .

[12]  T. Guskey Staff Development and Teacher Change. , 1985 .

[13]  The effects of peer coaching cycles on teacher use of a complex teaching skill and teachers' sense of efficacy , 1995 .

[14]  Jennifer I. Berne,et al.  Chapter 6 : Teacher Learning and the Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An Examination of Research on Contemporary Professlonal Development , 1999 .

[15]  Pam Robbins,et al.  How to plan and implement a peer coaching program , 1991 .

[16]  Kitty Kwakman,et al.  Factors affecting teachers' participation in professional learning activities , 2003 .

[17]  S. Bolhuis Professional development between teachers practical knowledge and external demands : plea for a broad social-constructivist and critical approach , 2006 .

[18]  Eric Hoyle,et al.  Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice , 1995 .

[19]  Robert Ackland,et al.  A Review of the Peer Coaching Literature. , 1991 .

[20]  R. Leitch,et al.  Teachers’ and teacher educators’ lives: the role of emotion , 2001 .

[21]  F. Korthagen,et al.  Teachers’ Professional Learning: How Does It Work? , 2001 .

[22]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[23]  Andy Hargreaves,et al.  The emotional practice of teaching , 1998 .

[24]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[25]  B. Joyce,et al.  The Evolution of Peer Coaching , 1996 .

[26]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Teacher Learning: Implications of New Views of Cognition , 1997 .

[27]  T. Guskey Professional Development and Teacher Change , 2002 .

[28]  J. Kessels,et al.  Linking Practice and Theory: The Pedagogy of Realistic Teacher Education , 2001 .

[29]  Teacher Accommodative Change. , 2003 .

[30]  Fred A. J. Korthagen,et al.  Linking Theory and Practice: Changing the Pedagogy of Teacher Education , 1999 .

[31]  B. Joyce,et al.  Student Achievement Through Staff Development , 1988 .