Modularity and interactions in the genetics of gene expression

Understanding the effect of genetic sequence variation on phenotype is a major challenge that lies at the heart of genetics. We developed GOLPH (GenOmic Linkage to PHenotype), a statistical method to identify genetic interactions, and used it to characterize the landscape of genetic interactions between gene expression quantitative trait loci. Our results reveal that allele-specific interactions, in which a gene only exerts an influence on the phenotype in the presence of a particular allele at the primary locus, are widespread and that genetic interactions are predominantly nonadditive. The data portray a complex picture in which interacting loci influence the expression of modules of coexpressed genes involved in coherent biological processes and pathways. We show that genetic variation at a single gene can have a major impact on the global transcriptional response, altering interactions between genes through shutdown or activation of pathways. Thus, different cellular states occur not only in response to the external environment but also result from intrinsic genetic variation.

[1]  John D. Storey,et al.  Multiple Locus Linkage Analysis of Genomewide Expression in Yeast , 2005, PLoS biology.

[2]  B. L. Welch THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO MEANS WHEN THE POPULATION VARIANCES ARE UNEQUAL , 1938 .

[3]  S. Horvath,et al.  Variations in DNA elucidate molecular networks that cause disease , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Rachel B. Brem,et al.  The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Rachel B. Brem,et al.  Integrating large-scale functional genomic data to dissect the complexity of yeast regulatory networks , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Rachel B. Brem,et al.  Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[7]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[8]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Identifying regulatory mechanisms using individual variation reveals key role for chromatin modification , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Transcriptional Regulation in Budding Yeast , 2002, Science.

[10]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[11]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Jun Zhu,et al.  Increasing the Power to Detect Causal Associations by Combining Genotypic and Expression Data in Segregating Populations , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[14]  E. Dibrov,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae TCM62 Gene Encodes a Chaperone Necessary for the Assembly of the Mitochondrial Succinate Dehydrogenase (Complex II)* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Gene–Environment Interaction in Yeast Gene Expression , 2008, PLoS biology.

[16]  K. Kwast,et al.  Oxygen sensing and the transcriptional regulation of oxygen-responsive genes in yeast. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[17]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls , 2007, Nature.

[18]  Michal Linial,et al.  Using Bayesian Networks to Analyze Expression Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[19]  Stuart L Schreiber,et al.  Genetic basis of individual differences in the response to small-molecule drugs in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[20]  J. Haines,et al.  Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families. , 1993, Science.

[21]  R. Stoughton,et al.  Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man , 2003, Nature.

[22]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[23]  Ting Wang,et al.  An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  Robert M. Plenge,et al.  Defining the Role of the MHC in Autoimmunity: A Review and Pooled Analysis , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[25]  John D. Storey,et al.  Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast , 2005, Nature.

[26]  R. Spielman,et al.  Natural variation in human gene expression assessed in lymphoblastoid cells , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  eQED: an efficient method for interpreting eQTL associations using protein networks , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[28]  Catarina D. Campbell,et al.  A survey of allelic imbalance in F1 mice. , 2008, Genome research.

[29]  S. Rafii,et al.  Splitting vessels: Keeping lymph apart from blood , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[30]  T. Gilliam,et al.  Genetic-linkage mapping of complex hereditary disorders to a whole-genome molecular-interaction network. , 2008, Genome research.

[31]  Judy H Cho,et al.  Deletion polymorphism upstream of IRGM associated with altered IRGM expression and Crohn's disease , 2008, Nature Genetics.