Economic Feasibility of Kite-Based Wind Energy Powerships with CAES or Hydrogen Storage

The rise in the usage of sustainable energy conversion technologies has been remarkable. However, the growth of these technologies poses several problems, mainly concerning the net integration of intermittent energy sources, like wind and solar power, by means of advanced storage systems and the land consumption the use of these energy sources implies. Furthermore, the economic viability of these solutions is in question, as they are to date still often heavily supported by financial subsidies. The Powership concept attempts to tackle these shortcomings by harvesting wind energy offshore using an alternative infrastructural approach which features a special-purpose ship towed by a high-flying kite. The ship’s resulting kinetic energy is partially converted by a water repeller and can either be used to compress and store air in steel tubes (Alternative 1) or to drive a generator which in turn delivers electrical energy to produce hydrogen (Alternative 2). In this study, the economic feasibility of each of the two alternatives is investigated and compared with the other using real options analysis, including both R&D and market risks as stochastic variables driving the option’s value. In order to determine the strategic value of managerial flexibility in the face of uncertainty, assumptions concerning the change of the economic environment are made and motivated.

[1]  Vom Fachbereich Elektrotechnik Optimierte Betriebsführung von Windenergieanlagen durch Energiespeicher , 2009 .

[3]  Paul Denholm,et al.  The value of compressed air energy storage with wind in transmission-constrained electric power systems , 2009 .

[4]  Dennis Y.C. Leung,et al.  Wind energy development and its environmental impact: A review , 2012 .

[5]  T. Copeland Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[6]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: the prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints , 2004 .

[7]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Impact of ICT and Human Skills on the European Financial Intermediation Sector , 2008 .

[8]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Renewable Energy Policy in the Presence of Innovation: Does Government Pre-Commitment Matter? , 2010 .

[9]  Amany von Oehsen,et al.  Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global , 2012 .

[10]  Sumit Joshi,et al.  Uncertainty, networks and real options , 2010 .

[11]  Rodrigo Rivera-Tinoco,et al.  Cost reductions for offshore wind power: Exploring the balance between scaling, learning and R&D , 2012 .

[12]  A. T. Holen,et al.  A Norwegian case study on the production of hydrogen from wind power , 2007 .

[13]  David Lusseau,et al.  Assessing the responses of coastal cetaceans to the construction of offshore wind turbines. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[14]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Towards an Efficient and Low-Carbon Economy Post-2012: Opportunities and Barriers for Foreign Companies in the Russian Market , 2011 .

[15]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Sustainable energy development in Austria until 2020: Insights from applying the integrated model “e3.at” , 2011, Energy policy.

[16]  Stephanie Ropenus,et al.  Production price of hydrogen from grid connected electrolysis in a power market with high wind penetration , 2008 .

[17]  Alfred J. Cavallo,et al.  Controllable and affordable utility-scale electricity from intermittent wind resources and compressed air energy storage (CAES) , 2007 .

[18]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[19]  Begoña Guezuraga,et al.  Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines , 2012 .

[20]  Johnathan Mun,et al.  Real options analysis : tools and techniques for valuing strategic investments and decisions , 2012 .

[21]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Appliance Endowment and User Behaviour by Age Group: Insights from a Swiss Micro-Survey on Residential Electricity Demand , 2010 .

[22]  R. Madlener,et al.  Power Plant Investments in the Turkish Electricity Sector: A Real Options Approach Taking into Account Market Liberalization , 2011 .

[23]  Raphael N. Markellos,et al.  Are Electricity Risk Premia Affected by Emission Allowance Prices? Evidence from the EEX, Nord Pool and Powernext , 2009 .

[24]  S. Rachev,et al.  Spot and Derivative Pricing in the EEX Power Market , 2007 .

[25]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Carl-Jochen Winter,et al.  Hydrogen energy — Abundant, efficient, clean: A debate over the energy-system-of-change☆ , 2009 .

[27]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Key strategies of hydrogen energy systems for sustainability , 2007 .

[28]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Efficient Investment Portfolios for the Swiss Electricity Supply Sector , 2008 .

[29]  J. Hansen,et al.  Efficacy of climate forcings , 2005 .

[30]  Georges Garabeth Salgi,et al.  The role of compressed air energy storage (CAES) in future sustainable energy systems , 2009 .