Determination of the drag coefficient during the first and second gliding positions of the breaststroke underwater stroke.

The purpose of the current study was to assess and to compare the hydrodynamics of the first and second gliding positions of the breaststroke underwater stroke used after starts and turns, considering drag force (D), drag coefficient (CD) and cross-sectional area (S). Twelve national-level swimmers were tested (6 males and 6 females, respectively 18.2±4.0 and 17.3±3.0 years old). Hydrodynamic parameters were assessed through inverse dynamics from the velocity to time curve characteristic of the underwater armstroke of the breaststroke technique. The results allow us to conclude that, for the same gliding velocities (1.37±0.124 m/s), D and the swimmers' S and CD values obtained for the first gliding position are significantly lower than the corresponding values obtained for the second gliding position of the breaststroke underwater stroke (31.67±6.44 N vs. 46.25±7.22 N; 740.42±101.89 cm2 vs. 784.25±99.62 cm2 and 0.458±0.076 vs. 0.664±0.234, respectively). These differences observed for the total sample were not evident for each one of the gender's subgroups.

[1]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  The effect of depth and velocity on drag during the streamlined guide. , 2000 .

[2]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Brian J. Gordon,et al.  Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Competitive Swimmers of Different Genders and Performance Levels , 1997 .

[4]  J. Lacour,et al.  The Contribution of Passive Drag as a Determinant of Swimming Performance , 1990, International journal of sports medicine.

[5]  J. Counsilman The complete book of swimming , 1977 .

[6]  James E. Counsilman Forces in Swimming Two Types of Crawl Stroke , 1955 .

[7]  T. Hung Life in Moving Fluids—The physical biology of flow , 1988 .

[8]  P. Morouco,et al.  A kinematical, imagiological and acoustical biofeedback system for the technical training in breaststroke swimming , 2006 .

[9]  J. C. Chatard,et al.  Passive drag is still a good evaluator of swimming aptitude , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[10]  J. R. Lacour,et al.  Experimental study of the performance of competition swimmers , 1975, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[11]  António J Silva,et al.  Hydrodynamic drag during gliding in swimming. , 2009, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[12]  M. V. Lomonosov,et al.  ACTIVE DRAG, USEFUL MECHANICAL POWER OUTPUT AND HYDRODYNAMIC FORCE COEFFICIENT IN DIFFERENT SWIMMING STROKES AT MAXIMAL VELOCITY , 1992 .

[13]  Huub M Toussaint,et al.  The determination of drag in front crawl swimming. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  A. P. Hollander,et al.  Active and passive drag in swimming , 1989 .

[15]  S. Vogel Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow , 1981 .

[16]  D G Lloyd,et al.  Net forces during tethered simulation of underwater streamlined gliding and kicking techniques of the freestyle turn , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  马格利索,et al.  游得最快(Swimming Fastest)连载(十三) , 2010 .