Understanding policing demand and deployment through the lens of the city and with the application of big data

The effective, efficient and equitable policing of urban areas rests on an appreciation of the qualities and scale of, as well as the factors shaping, demand. It also requires an appreciation of the factors shaping the resources deployed in their address. To this end, this article probes the extent to which policing demand (crime, anti-social behaviour, public safety and welfare) and deployment (front-line resource) are similarly conditioned by the social and physical urban environment, and by incident complexity. The prospect of exploring policing demand, deployment and their interplay is opened through the utilisation of big data and artificial intelligence and their integration with administrative and open data sources in a generalised method of moments (GMM) multilevel model. The research finds that policing demand and deployment hold varying and time-sensitive association with features of the urban environment. Moreover, we find that the complexities embedded in policing demands serve to shape both the cumulative and marginal resources expended in their address. Beyond their substantive policy relevance, these findings serve to open new avenues for urban criminological research centred on the consideration of the interplay between policing demand and deployment.

[1]  R. Sampson,et al.  Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Yiming Wang,et al.  Multi-level temporal autoregressive modelling of daily activity satisfaction using GPS-integrated activity diary data , 2018, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  James C. Wo Understanding the Differential Effects of Land Uses On Crime: An Examination Across Philadelphia Neighbourhoods , 2019, The British Journal of Criminology.

[4]  P. Brantingham,et al.  Environment, Routine, and Situation: Toward a Pattern Theory of Crime (1993) , 2010 .

[5]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence , 2001 .

[6]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[7]  Gary Higgs,et al.  Visualising space and time in crime patterns: A comparison of methods , 2007, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[8]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem , 2012 .

[9]  H. Miller A MEASUREMENT THEORY FOR TIME GEOGRAPHY , 2005 .

[10]  Martin A. Andresen,et al.  What do police do and where do they do it? , 2018 .

[11]  Daqiang Zhang,et al.  A Smart Work Performance Measurement System for Police Officers , 2015, IEEE Access.

[12]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Understanding the concept of ‘demand’ in policing: a scoping review and resulting implications for demand management , 2020, Policing and Society.

[13]  Andrew D. Newton,et al.  Crime and the NTE: multi-classification crime (MCC) hot spots in time and space , 2015 .

[14]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[15]  John R. Hipp GENERAL THEORY OF SPATIAL CRIME PATTERNS , 2016 .

[16]  J. Bannister,et al.  The Influence of Intra-Daily Activities and Settings upon Weekday Violent Crime in Public Spaces in Manchester, UK , 2020, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research.

[17]  P. Moran Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[18]  John R. Hipp INCOME INEQUALITY, RACE, AND PLACE: DOES THE DISTRIBUTION OF RACE AND CLASS WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS AFFECT CRIME RATES?* , 2007 .

[19]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[20]  Mark Ellison,et al.  An Automated Text Mining Approach for Classifying Mental-Ill Health Incidents from Police Incident Logs for Data-Driven Intelligence , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC).

[21]  Jee-Seon Kim,et al.  Multilevel Modeling with Correlated Effects , 2007 .

[22]  Barak Ariel,et al.  Tracking of Police Patrol , 2014 .

[23]  P. Brantingham,et al.  Criminality of place , 1995 .

[24]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[25]  Barak Ariel,et al.  “Soft” policing at hot spots—do police community support officers work? A randomized controlled trial , 2016 .

[26]  P. Eckersley,et al.  Accountability and transparency: Police forces in England and Wales , 2017 .

[27]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[28]  Muhammad Salman Haleem,et al.  The ‘Exposed’ Population, Violent Crime in Public Space and the Night-time Economy in Manchester, UK , 2020, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research.

[29]  Laura Boulton,et al.  Calls for police service , 2016 .

[30]  R. Sampson Collective Efficacy Theory: Lessons Learned and Directions for Future Inquiry. , 2006 .

[31]  G. Galster,et al.  Criminal Neighbourhoods: Does the Density of Prior Offenders in an Area Encourage others to Commit Crime? , 2014 .

[32]  Stephen D. Gottfredson,et al.  Environmental Design, Crime, and Prevention: An Examination of Community Dynamics , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[33]  Kate J. Bowers,et al.  Risky Facilities: Crime Radiators or Crime Absorbers? A Comparison of Internal and External Levels of Theft , 2013, Journal of Quantitative Criminology.

[34]  J. Bannister,et al.  Place and time in the Criminology of Place , 2019 .

[35]  R. Boivin,et al.  A Network of Neighborhoods , 2017 .

[36]  Katherine M. Bulifant The New World of Police Accountability , 2014 .

[37]  Metcalfe Michelle Ann Calls for Police Service : Understanding the demand profile and the UK police response , 2020 .

[38]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[39]  H. D. McKay,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas , 1943 .