Measuring needs with the thematic apperception test: a psychometric study.

Three apperception theories that explain how people respond to Thematic Apperception Test cards are proposed: a simple apperception theory, an apperception theory with a dynamic component, and an apperception theory with 2 types of responses. Each theory is translated into an item response theory model and is applied to need for achievement (nAch) data. The analysis indicates that the best fitting model is provided by the apperception theory with 2 types of responses, also referred to as the drop-out apperception theory. The 1st type of response predicted by this theory is determined by the nAch level of the person and the achievement-response-eliciting value of the card; this response is diagnostic for the nAch level of the person. The 2nd type of response is not determined by the 2 aforementioned characteristics and is therefore not diagnostic of the person's nAch level. The results are cross-validated for need for power and need for affiliation.

[1]  D. Winter,et al.  Traits and motives: toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. , 1998, Psychological review.

[2]  J. Rice.  Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[3]  Kristof Vansteelandt,et al.  A formal model for the competency–demand hypothesis , 1999 .

[4]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[5]  S. Fineman.  The Achievement Motive Construct and its Measurement: Where Are We Now?. , 1977 .

[6]  V. Blankenship,et al.  Comparing power imagery in TATs written by hand or on the computer , 1998 .

[7]  E. Klinger.  Fantasy need achievement as a motivational construct. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[9]  H. P. David.  Die Psychometrischen Grundlagen des Rorschachtests und der Holtzman Inkblot Technique. , 1974 .

[10]  J. W. Atkinson.  Motives In Fantasy, Action, And Society , 1958 .

[11]  N. Lewis.  A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .

[12]  Hirotugu Akaike,et al.  On entropy maximization principle , 1977 .

[13]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[14]  S. Embretson,et al.  Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .

[15]  G. Gurin,et al.  Americans View Their Mental Health , 1979 .

[16]  S. Reise,et al.  Fitting the Two-Parameter Model to Personality Data , 1990 .

[17]  J. W. Atkinson,et al.  Explorations using computer simulation to comprehend thematic apperceptive measurement of motivation , 1977 .

[18]  B. I. Murstein.  Handbook of projective techniques , 1965 .

[19]  Paul De Boeck,et al.  A parametric model for local dependence among test items. , 1997 .

[20]  J. W. Atkinson,et al.  On the dynamics of action. , 1970, Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie en haar grensgebieden.

[21]  John W. Atkinson,et al.  Studying personality in the context of an advanced motivational psychology. , 1981 .

[22]  W. D. Spangler.  Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. , 1992 .

[23]  Jutta Heckhausen,et al.  Motivation and action , 1991 .

[24]  K. Kraiger,et al.  Exploring fantasies of TAT reliability. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[25]  D. Winter,et al.  Power motive reliability as a function of retest instructions. , 1977 .

[26]  G. Gurin,et al.  The use of thematic apperception to assess motivation in a nationwide interview study. , 1960 .

[27]  T. Wickens.  Models for Behavior: Stochastic Processes in Psychology , 1982 .

[28]  A. Jensen,et al.  The reliability of projective techniques: Review of the literature , 1959 .

[29]  David C. McClelland,et al.  Motivation and personality: A scoring manual for the achievement motive , 1992 .

[30]  P. Cramer.  Future Directions for the Thematic Apperception Test , 1999 .

[31]  David C. McClelland,et al.  How Do Self-Attributed and Implicit Motives Differ?. , 1989 .

[32]  H. Murray,et al.  A METHOD FOR INVESTIGATING FANTASIES: THE THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST , 1935 .

[33]  Kelly A. Brennan,et al.  An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  J. E. Rafferty,et al.  A threshold conception of need value. , 1962 .

[35]  A. Lundy,et al.  The reliability of the Thematic Apperception Test. , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[36]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  Motivation and society , 1982 .

[37]  G. Gurin,et al.  Americans view their mental health: A nationwide interview survey. , 1962 .

[38]  J. W. Atkinson.  Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. , 1957, Psychological review.

[39]  H. Murray,et al.  Uses of the thematic apperception test. , 1951, The American journal of psychiatry.

[40]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  The Achievement Motive , 1954 .

[41]  P. Cramer.  Storytelling, Narrative, and the Thematic Apperception Test , 1996 .

[42]  J. Veroff,et al.  Explorations into the effects of picture cues on thematic apperceptive expression of achievement motivation. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  D. Reuman.  Ipsative behavioral variability and the quality of thematic apperceptive measurement of the achievement motive. , 1982 .

[44]  J. W. Atkinson.  Motivational determinants of thematic apperception. , 1992 .

[45]  Charles P. Smith.  Motivation and personality: Name Index , 1992 .

[46]  S. Lilienfeld,et al.  The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques , 2000, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[47]  D. Entwisle.  To Dispel Fantasies About Fantasy-Based Measures of Achievement Motivation. , 1972 .

[48]  V. James,et al.  An analysis of the factorial dimensions of the achievement motivation construct. , 1961 .

[49]  F. Mott.  ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY , 1923 .

[50]  Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie.  Archiv für Psychologie , 1970 .