Social Technologies, Informal Knowledge Practices, and the Enterprise

This article focuses on the ways in which social technologies facilitate informal knowledge sharing in the workplace. Social technologies include both common technologies such as email, phone, and instant messenger and emerging social networking technologies, often known as social media or Web 2.0, such as blogs, wikis, public social networking sites (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn), enterprise social networking technologies, etc. We know social technologies support informal interactions over digital systems and influence informal social connections among people within and across organizational boundaries. To understand the role of social technologies in informal knowledge practices, we pursue a field study of knowledge workers in consulting firms to investigate the role of social technologies in their informal knowledge sharing practices. Our theorizing from the data is guided by the conceptual premises of sociomateriality to better understand the ways social technologies are integrated with common knowledge practices. Findings highlight five knowledge practices supported by the use of social technologies. Building from these findings we offer conceptual insights regarding the material performance of different social technologies as an assemblage.

[1]  J. Morse Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[2]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Understanding email use: predicting action on a message , 2005, CHI.

[3]  R. Dunford KEY CHALLENGES IN THE SEARCH FOR THE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRMS. , 2000 .

[4]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[5]  Anna Wu,et al.  Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site , 2010, CHI.

[6]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  How Managers Use Multiple Media: Discrepant Events, Power, and Timing in Redundant Communication , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[7]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[8]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[9]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[10]  K. Riemer,et al.  Corporate Social Networking Sites – Modes of Use and Appropriation through Co-Evolution , 2009 .

[11]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[12]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[13]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  A Confessional Account of an Ethnography About Knowledge Work , 2000, MIS Q..

[14]  France Bélanger,et al.  Virtual Teams and Multiple Media: Structuring Media Use to Attain Strategic Goals , 2006 .

[15]  P. Drucker Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge , 1999, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[16]  Michael Moon Knowledge worker productivity , 2009 .

[17]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[18]  Kathryn Zickuhr,et al.  65% of Online Adults Use Social Networking Sites , 2011 .

[19]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Corporate wiki users: results of a survey , 2006, WikiSym '06.

[20]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: A Case Study of Employee Blogging , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[21]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[22]  Roger F. Fidler,et al.  Mediamorphosis: Understanding New Media , 1997 .

[23]  Timothy Morris Asserting Property Rights: Knowledge Codification in the Professional Service Firm , 2001 .

[24]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  Casting the Net: A Multimodal Network Perspective on User-System Interactions , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  H. Gardner,et al.  Knowledge-Based Innovation: Emergence and Embedding of New Practice Areas in Management Consulting Firms , 2007 .

[26]  L. Empson Fear of Exploitation and Fear of Contamination: Impediments to Knowledge Transfer in Mergers between Professional Service Firms , 2001 .

[27]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work , 2009, GROUP.

[28]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[29]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities and technologies , 2003 .

[30]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Social Brain Hypothesis , 1998, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[31]  B. Glaser Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[34]  Marc H. Goedhart,et al.  What really drives the market , 2005 .

[35]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[36]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[38]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization , 2009, C&T.

[39]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Lee Komito,et al.  The Net as a Foraging Society: Flexible Communities , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[41]  J. Reinsch,et al.  Multicommunicating: A Practice Whose Time Has Come? , 2008 .

[42]  Andreas Schulze-Kopp,et al.  Enterprise 2.0 , 2013 .

[43]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The Future of the Web: Beyond Enterprise 2.0 , 2007 .

[44]  D. Boyd Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics , 2010 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  Marco Rosa,et al.  Four degrees of separation , 2011, WebSci '12.

[47]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[48]  Niall Cook,et al.  Enterprise 2.0 , 2008 .

[49]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[50]  R. Cross,et al.  Six Myths About Informal Networks -- and How to Overcome Them , 2002 .

[51]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization's Toughest Challenges , 2009 .

[52]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration , 2002 .

[53]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material Works: Exploring the Situated Entanglement of Technological Performativity and Human Agency , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Enterprise Microblogging , 2010, Wirtschaftsinf..

[55]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin , 2009, GROUP.

[56]  Susan Gasson,et al.  Adaptations that Virtual Teams Make so that Complex Tasks Can Be Performed Using Simple E-Collaboration Technologies , 2006, Int. J. e Collab..

[57]  A. Werr,et al.  Exploring Management Consulting Firms as Knowledge Systems , 2003 .

[58]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[59]  M. Marshall Sampling for qualitative research. , 1996, Family practice.