Noise robustness and parallel computation of the inverse compositional Gauss-Newton algorithm in digital image correlation

Abstract The inverse compositional Gauss–Newton (IC-GN) algorithm is one of the most popular sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation (DIC). The IC-GN algorithm, compared with the traditional forward additive Newton–Raphson (FA-NR) algorithm, can achieve the same accuracy in less time. However, there are no clear results regarding the noise robustness of IC-GN algorithm and the computational efficiency is still in need of further improvements. In this paper, a theoretical model of the IC-GN algorithm was derived based on the sum of squared differences correlation criterion and linear interpolation. The model indicates that the IC-GN algorithm has better noise robustness than the FA-NR algorithm, and shows no noise-induced bias if the gray gradient operator is chosen properly. Both numerical simulations and experiments show good agreements with the theoretical predictions. Furthermore, a seed point-based parallel method is proposed to improve the calculation speed. Compared with the recently proposed path-independent method, our model is feasible and practical, and it can maximize the computing speed using an improved initial guess. Moreover, we compared the computational efficiency of our method with that of the reliability-guided method using a four-point bending experiment, and the results show that the computational efficiency is greatly improved. This proposed parallel IC-GN algorithm has good noise robustness and is expected to be a practical option for real-time DIC.

[1]  Zhenyu Jiang,et al.  Path-independent digital image correlation with high accuracy, speed and robustness , 2015 .

[2]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method , 1983, Image Vis. Comput..

[3]  K. Qian,et al.  Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. , 2008, Optics express.

[4]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Quantitative Error Assessment in Pattern Matching: Effects of Intensity Pattern Noise, Interpolation, Strain and Image Contrast on Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[5]  Jiaqing Zhao,et al.  Initial guess by improved population-based intelligent algorithms for large inter-frame deformation measurement using digital image correlation , 2012 .

[6]  D. M. Freeman,et al.  Statistics of subpixel registration algorithms based on spatiotemporal gradients or block matching , 1998 .

[7]  Wei Tong,et al.  Fast, Robust and Accurate Digital Image Correlation Calculation Without Redundant Computations , 2013, Experimental Mechanics.

[8]  Zhang Yong,et al.  High-efficiency and high-accuracy digital image correlation for three-dimensional measurement , 2015 .

[9]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review , 2009 .

[10]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction , 1989 .

[11]  Yan Qiu Chen,et al.  Large deformation measurement using digital image correlation: a fully automated approach. , 2012, Applied optics.

[12]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[13]  Wei Tong Subpixel image registration with reduced bias. , 2011, Optics letters.

[14]  I. Yamaguchi,et al.  A laser-speckle strain gauge , 1981 .

[15]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Performance of optical flow techniques , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  H. Lu,et al.  Deformation measurements by digital image correlation: Implementation of a second-order displacement gradient , 2000 .

[17]  J. Tong,et al.  Statistical Analysis of the Effect of Intensity Pattern Noise on the Displacement Measurement Precision of Digital Image Correlation Using Self-correlated Images , 2007 .

[18]  Yan Qiu Chen,et al.  Propagation function for accurate initialization and efficiency enhancement of digital image correlation , 2012 .

[19]  Simon Baker,et al.  Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On: A Unifying Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[20]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Improving Noise Robustness in Subspace-Based Joint Sparse Recovery , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  Xie Huimin,et al.  Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation , 2006 .

[22]  P Refregier Optimal trade-off filters for noise robustness, sharpness of the correlation peak, and Horner efficiency. , 1991, Optics letters.

[23]  Jun Ma,et al.  Accuracy enhancement of digital image correlation with B-spline interpolation. , 2011, Optics letters.

[24]  Y. Wang,et al.  Impact of lens distortions on strain measurements obtained with 2D digital image correlation , 2013 .

[25]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[26]  Hisao Kikuta,et al.  Lens distortion correction for digital image correlation by measuring rigid body displacement , 2006 .