Comparison of optical and video see-through, head-mounted displays

One of the most promising and challenging future uses of head-mounted displays (HMDs) is in applications where virtual environments enhance rather than replace real environments. To obtain an enhanced view of the real environment, the user wears a see-through HMD to see 3D computer-generated objects superimposed on his/her real-world view. This see-through capability can be accomplished using either an optical or a video see-through HMD. We discuss the tradeoffs between optical and video see-through HMDs with respect to technological, perceptual, and human factors issues, and discuss our experience designing, building, using, and testing these HMDs.

[1]  C Tomasi,et al.  Shape and motion from image streams: a factorization method. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  B. Welch,et al.  The Fiber-Optic Helmet-Mounted Display, , 1984 .

[3]  Ivan E. Sutherland,et al.  The Ultimate Display , 1965 .

[4]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  David W. Allen.  A 1" high resolution field sequential display for head mounted applications , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[6]  Hong Chen,et al.  Observing a volume rendered fetus within a pregnant patient , 1994, Proceedings Visualization '94.

[7]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through HMD , 1994, SIGGRAPH.